{"id":2622,"date":"2024-11-24T06:14:30","date_gmt":"2024-11-24T06:14:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/?page_id=2622"},"modified":"2025-02-16T00:38:21","modified_gmt":"2025-02-15T19:08:21","slug":"family-law","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Family Law"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-page\" data-elementor-id=\"2622\" class=\"elementor elementor-2622\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-ce37983 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"ce37983\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-525956c\" data-id=\"525956c\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d6987e9 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"d6987e9\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Family Law<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8118200 elementor-widget-divider--separator-type-pattern elementor-widget-divider--no-spacing elementor-widget-divider--view-line elementor-widget elementor-widget-divider\" data-id=\"8118200\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"divider.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-divider\" style=\"--divider-pattern-url: url(&quot;data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns=&#039;http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg&#039; preserveAspectRatio=&#039;none&#039; overflow=&#039;visible&#039; height=&#039;100%&#039; viewBox=&#039;0 0 24 24&#039; fill=&#039;black&#039; stroke=&#039;none&#039;%3E%3Cpath d=&#039;M24,8v12H0V8H24z M24,4v1H0V4H24z&#039;\/%3E%3C\/svg%3E&quot;);\">\n\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-divider-separator\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0aebdab elementor-widget__width-inherit elementor-grid-eael-col-4 elementor-grid-tablet-eael-col-2 elementor-grid-mobile-eael-col-1 elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-post-grid\" data-id=\"0aebdab\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-settings=\"{&quot;eael_post_grid_columns&quot;:&quot;eael-col-4&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_tablet&quot;:&quot;eael-col-2&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_mobile&quot;:&quot;eael-col-1&quot;}\" data-widget_type=\"eael-post-grid.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div id=\"eael-post-grid-0aebdab\" class=\"eael-post-grid-container\">\n            <div class=\"eael-post-grid eael-post-appender eael-post-appender-0aebdab eael-post-grid-style-one\" data-layout-mode=\"masonry\"><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5040 category-family-law tags-family-law-ii-hindu-joint-family-hindu-succession-act-1956-karta-member-supreme-court\" data-id=\"5040\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shreya-vidyarthi-v-ashok-vidyarthi-ors-2015-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_A107p9z7ThmN2hAku1VnHQ_kuhjhvU2TfiOsHPohVjUwQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5042\" alt=\"Shreya Vidyarthi v. Ashok Vidyarthi &amp; Ors 2015\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_A107p9z7ThmN2hAku1VnHQ_kuhjhvU2TfiOsHPohVjUwQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_A107p9z7ThmN2hAku1VnHQ_kuhjhvU2TfiOsHPohVjUwQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_A107p9z7ThmN2hAku1VnHQ_kuhjhvU2TfiOsHPohVjUwQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_A107p9z7ThmN2hAku1VnHQ_kuhjhvU2TfiOsHPohVjUwQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_A107p9z7ThmN2hAku1VnHQ_kuhjhvU2TfiOsHPohVjUwQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shreya-vidyarthi-v-ashok-vidyarthi-ors-2015-case-summary\/\" title=\"Shreya Vidyarthi v.  Ashok Vidyarthi &#038; Ors 2015 (Case Summary)\u200b\">Shreya Vidyarthi v.  Ashok Vidyarthi &#038; Ors 2015 (Case<\/a><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 ez-toc-wrap-left counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/corbett-v-corbett-1970-2-all-er-33case-summary\/#Facts_of_Corbett_v_Corbett\" >Facts of Corbett v. Corbett<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/corbett-v-corbett-1970-2-all-er-33case-summary\/#Issues_framed\" >Issues framed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/corbett-v-corbett-1970-2-all-er-33case-summary\/#Judgment_of_Corbett_v_Corbett\" >Judgment of Corbett v. Corbett<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/corbett-v-corbett-1970-2-all-er-33case-summary\/#Click_here_to_read_the_Judgment\" >Click here to read the Judgment<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case, decided by the Supreme Court of India, centered around a dispute over the ownership and nature of a...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shreya-vidyarthi-v-ashok-vidyarthi-ors-2015-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5031 category-family-law tags-family-law-ii-hindu-joint-family-hindu-succession-act-1956-karta-member-supreme-court\" data-id=\"5031\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/jaganarayan-lal-v-doctor-smt-girija-tiwari-2021case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-scre_4F8_IjRhRpe7abNwnwfUXA_vQzrlqO8RxyZyzSmD1gLQg-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5096\" alt=\"Jaganarayan Lal v. Doctor Smt. Girija Tiwari\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-scre_4F8_IjRhRpe7abNwnwfUXA_vQzrlqO8RxyZyzSmD1gLQg-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-scre_4F8_IjRhRpe7abNwnwfUXA_vQzrlqO8RxyZyzSmD1gLQg-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-scre_4F8_IjRhRpe7abNwnwfUXA_vQzrlqO8RxyZyzSmD1gLQg-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-scre_4F8_IjRhRpe7abNwnwfUXA_vQzrlqO8RxyZyzSmD1gLQg-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-scre_4F8_IjRhRpe7abNwnwfUXA_vQzrlqO8RxyZyzSmD1gLQg.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/jaganarayan-lal-v-doctor-smt-girija-tiwari-2021case-summary\/\" title=\"Jaganarayan Lal v. Doctor Smt. Girija Tiwari 2021(Case Summary)\u200b\">Jaganarayan Lal v. Doctor Smt. Girija Tiwari 2021(Case Summary)\u200b<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case is significant in determining who qualifies as a consumer and beneficiary under consumer protection laws, particularly in medical...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/jaganarayan-lal-v-doctor-smt-girija-tiwari-2021case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4851 category-family-law tags-family-law-ii-hindu-joint-family-hindu-succession-act-1956-supreme-court\" data-id=\"4851\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/adiveppa-v-bhimappa-2017-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-multiple-peo_cYtzytOXR7C0Cda1iZgkpQ_NI6m6KaxTweIhSBDp9Yagw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4854\" alt=\"Adiveppa v. Bhimappa (2017)\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-multiple-peo_cYtzytOXR7C0Cda1iZgkpQ_NI6m6KaxTweIhSBDp9Yagw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-multiple-peo_cYtzytOXR7C0Cda1iZgkpQ_NI6m6KaxTweIhSBDp9Yagw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-multiple-peo_cYtzytOXR7C0Cda1iZgkpQ_NI6m6KaxTweIhSBDp9Yagw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-multiple-peo_cYtzytOXR7C0Cda1iZgkpQ_NI6m6KaxTweIhSBDp9Yagw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-multiple-peo_cYtzytOXR7C0Cda1iZgkpQ_NI6m6KaxTweIhSBDp9Yagw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/adiveppa-v-bhimappa-2017-case-summary\/\" title=\"Adiveppa v. Bhimappa 2017 (Case Summary)\u200b\">Adiveppa v. Bhimappa 2017 (Case Summary)\u200b<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case involves a dispute over ancestral property between members of a Hindu joint family. The Supreme Court ruled on...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/adiveppa-v-bhimappa-2017-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4840 category-family-law tags-2005-daughters-coparcenary-rights-family-law-ii-hindu-succession-amendment-act-hindu-succession-act-1956-hindu-undivided-family-supreme-court\" data-id=\"4840\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/prakash-vs-phulavati-air-2016-sc-769-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-case-summary-with-the-bold-text-prakas_gsto_6EIQNumKq-vI2YlEw_xskkuxCeSYa_eKJD_KRmKw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4842\" alt=\"Prakash vs Phulavati AIR 2016 SC 769\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-case-summary-with-the-bold-text-prakas_gsto_6EIQNumKq-vI2YlEw_xskkuxCeSYa_eKJD_KRmKw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-case-summary-with-the-bold-text-prakas_gsto_6EIQNumKq-vI2YlEw_xskkuxCeSYa_eKJD_KRmKw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-case-summary-with-the-bold-text-prakas_gsto_6EIQNumKq-vI2YlEw_xskkuxCeSYa_eKJD_KRmKw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-case-summary-with-the-bold-text-prakas_gsto_6EIQNumKq-vI2YlEw_xskkuxCeSYa_eKJD_KRmKw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-case-summary-with-the-bold-text-prakas_gsto_6EIQNumKq-vI2YlEw_xskkuxCeSYa_eKJD_KRmKw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/prakash-vs-phulavati-air-2016-sc-769-case-summary\/\" title=\"Prakash vs Phulavati  2016 (Case Summary)\u200b\">Prakash vs Phulavati  2016 (Case Summary)\u200b<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case, decided by the Supreme Court of India, involved the interpretation of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, particularly...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/prakash-vs-phulavati-air-2016-sc-769-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4830 category-family-law tags-daughters-coparcenary-rights-family-law-ii-hindu-succession-act-1956-hindu-undivided-family-mitakshara-law-of-succession-section-6-supreme-court\" data-id=\"4830\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/vineeta-sharma-v-rakesh-sharma-2020-9-scc-576-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-the-vineeta-_nL8f9hp4T2y1Iviwny5qpQ_lbCcERLOT32IrX-EgXmN2g-1-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4834\" alt=\"Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma 2020 9 SCC 576\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-the-vineeta-_nL8f9hp4T2y1Iviwny5qpQ_lbCcERLOT32IrX-EgXmN2g-1-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-the-vineeta-_nL8f9hp4T2y1Iviwny5qpQ_lbCcERLOT32IrX-EgXmN2g-1-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-the-vineeta-_nL8f9hp4T2y1Iviwny5qpQ_lbCcERLOT32IrX-EgXmN2g-1-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-the-vineeta-_nL8f9hp4T2y1Iviwny5qpQ_lbCcERLOT32IrX-EgXmN2g-1-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-the-vineeta-_nL8f9hp4T2y1Iviwny5qpQ_lbCcERLOT32IrX-EgXmN2g-1.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/vineeta-sharma-v-rakesh-sharma-2020-9-scc-576-case-summary\/\" title=\"Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma 2020 (Case Summary)\u200b\">Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma 2020 (Case Summary)\u200b<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India upheld the equal rights of daughters in Hindu Undivided Family (HUF)...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/vineeta-sharma-v-rakesh-sharma-2020-9-scc-576-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3839 category-family-law tags-article-13-article-14-article-15-hindu-marriage-act-1955\" data-id=\"3839\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/state-of-bombay-v-narasu-appa-mali-1952-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"471\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/State-of-Bombay-v.-Narasu-Appa-Mali-AIR-1952-Bom-84-1024x471.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3841\" alt=\"State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali AIR 1952 Bom 84\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/State-of-Bombay-v.-Narasu-Appa-Mali-AIR-1952-Bom-84-1024x471.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/State-of-Bombay-v.-Narasu-Appa-Mali-AIR-1952-Bom-84-300x138.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/State-of-Bombay-v.-Narasu-Appa-Mali-AIR-1952-Bom-84-150x69.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/State-of-Bombay-v.-Narasu-Appa-Mali-AIR-1952-Bom-84-768x353.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/State-of-Bombay-v.-Narasu-Appa-Mali-AIR-1952-Bom-84-600x276.png 600w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/State-of-Bombay-v.-Narasu-Appa-Mali-AIR-1952-Bom-84.png 1305w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/state-of-bombay-v-narasu-appa-mali-1952-case-summary\/\" title=\"State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali AIR 1952 Bom 84 (Case Summary)\u200b\">State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali AIR 1952 Bom<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark case addressed the conflict between personal laws and constitutional mandates in India. The Bombay High Court addressed on...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/state-of-bombay-v-narasu-appa-mali-1952-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3309 category-family-law tags-hindu-marriage-act-1955-marriage-registration\" data-id=\"3309\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/seema-v-ashwani-kumar-2006-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_aq3Q9MZ8Tgq5SfMaPr-sFw_OuDv3mQ8Rp-7Yye5ElxRlw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3311\" alt=\"Seema v Ashwani Kumar AIR 2006 SC 1158\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_aq3Q9MZ8Tgq5SfMaPr-sFw_OuDv3mQ8Rp-7Yye5ElxRlw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_aq3Q9MZ8Tgq5SfMaPr-sFw_OuDv3mQ8Rp-7Yye5ElxRlw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_aq3Q9MZ8Tgq5SfMaPr-sFw_OuDv3mQ8Rp-7Yye5ElxRlw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_aq3Q9MZ8Tgq5SfMaPr-sFw_OuDv3mQ8Rp-7Yye5ElxRlw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_aq3Q9MZ8Tgq5SfMaPr-sFw_OuDv3mQ8Rp-7Yye5ElxRlw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/seema-v-ashwani-kumar-2006-case-summary\/\" title=\"Seema v Ashwani Kumar 2006 (Case Summary)\">Seema v Ashwani Kumar 2006 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The Supreme Court of India emphasized the importance of compulsory registration of marriages to address issues such as child marriage...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/seema-v-ashwani-kumar-2006-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3301 category-family-law tags-section-125-crpc\" data-id=\"3301\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shamim-ara-v-state-of-up-and-anr-2002-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shamim-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3304\" alt=\"Shamim Ara v State of UP and Anr. (2002) 7 SCC 518\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shamim-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shamim-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shamim-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shamim-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shamim.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shamim-ara-v-state-of-up-and-anr-2002-case-summary\/\" title=\"Shamim Ara v State of UP and Anr. 2002 (Case Summary)\">Shamim Ara v State of UP and Anr. 2002 (Case<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this judgment, the Supreme Court of India addressed the validity of triple talaq and clarified the requirements for a...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shamim-ara-v-state-of-up-and-anr-2002-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3280 category-family-law tags-hindu-marriage-act-1955\" data-id=\"3280\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shobha-rani-v-madhukar-reddy-1988-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shobha-rani-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3294\" alt=\"Shobha Rani v Madhukar Reddy AIR 1988 SC 121\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shobha-rani-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shobha-rani-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shobha-rani-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shobha-rani-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/shobha-rani.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shobha-rani-v-madhukar-reddy-1988-case-summary\/\" title=\"Shobha Rani v Madhukar Reddy 1988 (Case Summary)\">Shobha Rani v Madhukar Reddy 1988 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of cruelty in matrimonial cases and clarified that demanding dowry constitutes cruelty,...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shobha-rani-v-madhukar-reddy-1988-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3269 category-family-law tags-section-125-crpc-section-127-crpc\" data-id=\"3269\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim--1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3271\" alt=\"Noor Saba Khatoon v. Mohd. Quasim AIR 1997 SC 3280\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim--1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim--300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim--150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim--768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim-.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary\/\" title=\"Noor Saba Khatoon v. Mohd. Quasim  1997(Case Summary)\">Noor Saba Khatoon v. Mohd. Quasim  1997(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of a Muslim father\u2019s obligation to provide maintenance for his minor children,...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3250 category-family-law tags-hindu-marriage-act-1955-void-marriage\" data-id=\"3250\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/rameshwari-devi-v-state-of-bihar-2000-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_r5k7d800QxuYnNH_VX6AHg_gZ2SFe72TPy9hYeoVyrTug-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3264\" alt=\"Rameshwari Devi v. State of Bihar\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_r5k7d800QxuYnNH_VX6AHg_gZ2SFe72TPy9hYeoVyrTug-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_r5k7d800QxuYnNH_VX6AHg_gZ2SFe72TPy9hYeoVyrTug-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_r5k7d800QxuYnNH_VX6AHg_gZ2SFe72TPy9hYeoVyrTug-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_r5k7d800QxuYnNH_VX6AHg_gZ2SFe72TPy9hYeoVyrTug-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in_r5k7d800QxuYnNH_VX6AHg_gZ2SFe72TPy9hYeoVyrTug.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/rameshwari-devi-v-state-of-bihar-2000-case-summary\/\" title=\"Rameshwari Devi v. State of Bihar 2000 (Case Summary)\">Rameshwari Devi v. State of Bihar 2000 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India the Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of entitlement to...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/rameshwari-devi-v-state-of-bihar-2000-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3234 category-family-law tags-divorce-hindu-marriage-act-1955\" data-id=\"3234\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/vishnu-dutt-sharma-v-manju-sharma-2009case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-image-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-win_KC3jhc6DRoy8rV8BZpbg_Q_u9MxOwS0Q5Gy8fHb4DT9Ww-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3236\" alt=\"Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. Manju Sharma AIR 2009 SC 2254\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-image-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-win_KC3jhc6DRoy8rV8BZpbg_Q_u9MxOwS0Q5Gy8fHb4DT9Ww-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-image-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-win_KC3jhc6DRoy8rV8BZpbg_Q_u9MxOwS0Q5Gy8fHb4DT9Ww-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-image-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-win_KC3jhc6DRoy8rV8BZpbg_Q_u9MxOwS0Q5Gy8fHb4DT9Ww-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-image-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-win_KC3jhc6DRoy8rV8BZpbg_Q_u9MxOwS0Q5Gy8fHb4DT9Ww-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-image-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-win_KC3jhc6DRoy8rV8BZpbg_Q_u9MxOwS0Q5Gy8fHb4DT9Ww.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/vishnu-dutt-sharma-v-manju-sharma-2009case-summary\/\" title=\"Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. Manju Sharma 2009(Case Summary)\">Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. Manju Sharma 2009(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case, the Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and irretrievable...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/vishnu-dutt-sharma-v-manju-sharma-2009case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3226 category-family-law tags-hindu-adoptions-and-maintenance-act-1956-section-125-crpc\" data-id=\"3226\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/rajnesh-v-neha-2021-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_DEzftQm1RgakiEkQ1sLgrA_R72mm8FTQaqBL3l8UNlfzA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3228\" alt=\"Rajnesh v. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_DEzftQm1RgakiEkQ1sLgrA_R72mm8FTQaqBL3l8UNlfzA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_DEzftQm1RgakiEkQ1sLgrA_R72mm8FTQaqBL3l8UNlfzA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_DEzftQm1RgakiEkQ1sLgrA_R72mm8FTQaqBL3l8UNlfzA-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_DEzftQm1RgakiEkQ1sLgrA_R72mm8FTQaqBL3l8UNlfzA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-bu_DEzftQm1RgakiEkQ1sLgrA_R72mm8FTQaqBL3l8UNlfzA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/rajnesh-v-neha-2021-case-summary\/\" title=\"Rajnesh v. Neha 2021 (Case Summary)\">Rajnesh v. Neha 2021 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India laid down comprehensive guidelines on the payment of maintenance in matrimonial...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/rajnesh-v-neha-2021-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3104 category-family-law tags-hindu-adoptions-and-maintenance-act-1956\" data-id=\"3104\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/khazan-singh-v-union-of-india-1980-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seat_rNbSf5pQSd-UTEwnKar3kg_lHks-yviQDGKtgjdnqegng-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3106\" alt=\"Khazan Singh v. Union of India AIR 1980 Del 60\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seat_rNbSf5pQSd-UTEwnKar3kg_lHks-yviQDGKtgjdnqegng-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seat_rNbSf5pQSd-UTEwnKar3kg_lHks-yviQDGKtgjdnqegng-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seat_rNbSf5pQSd-UTEwnKar3kg_lHks-yviQDGKtgjdnqegng-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seat_rNbSf5pQSd-UTEwnKar3kg_lHks-yviQDGKtgjdnqegng-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seat_rNbSf5pQSd-UTEwnKar3kg_lHks-yviQDGKtgjdnqegng.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/khazan-singh-v-union-of-india-1980-case-summary\/\" title=\"Khazan Singh v. Union of India 1980 (Case Summary)\">Khazan Singh v. Union of India 1980 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In a landmark case that delves into the intricate relationship between adoption and caste status in India. The case of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/khazan-singh-v-union-of-india-1980-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3022 category-family-law tags-hindu-marriage-act-1955\" data-id=\"3022\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/harvinder-kaur-vs-harminder-singh-chaudhary-1984-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold_4kwBWygTQU6a9XoNCoC0bQ_SCiKAhnSSD2u3U6ZhK_vrw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3024\" alt=\"Harvinder Kaur vs. Harminder Singh Chaudhary AIR 1984 Delhi 66\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold_4kwBWygTQU6a9XoNCoC0bQ_SCiKAhnSSD2u3U6ZhK_vrw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold_4kwBWygTQU6a9XoNCoC0bQ_SCiKAhnSSD2u3U6ZhK_vrw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold_4kwBWygTQU6a9XoNCoC0bQ_SCiKAhnSSD2u3U6ZhK_vrw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold_4kwBWygTQU6a9XoNCoC0bQ_SCiKAhnSSD2u3U6ZhK_vrw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold_4kwBWygTQU6a9XoNCoC0bQ_SCiKAhnSSD2u3U6ZhK_vrw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/harvinder-kaur-vs-harminder-singh-chaudhary-1984-case-summary\/\" title=\"Harvinder Kaur vs. Harminder Singh Chaudhary 1984 (Case Summary)\">Harvinder Kaur vs. Harminder Singh Chaudhary 1984 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In the landmark case of Delhi High Court challenges the roots of a matrimonial relationship. It dealt with the issues...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/harvinder-kaur-vs-harminder-singh-chaudhary-1984-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3013 category-family-law tags-hindu-marriage-act-1955\" data-id=\"3013\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/satish-chander-ahuja-v-sneha-ahuja-2021-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-with-the-case-n_YwGd_KZ9Q4yvSNx3Z7OXow_mviTf6mQTKGyPQGw3epD9w-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3015\" alt=\"Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja (2021) 1 SCC 414\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-with-the-case-n_YwGd_KZ9Q4yvSNx3Z7OXow_mviTf6mQTKGyPQGw3epD9w-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-with-the-case-n_YwGd_KZ9Q4yvSNx3Z7OXow_mviTf6mQTKGyPQGw3epD9w-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-with-the-case-n_YwGd_KZ9Q4yvSNx3Z7OXow_mviTf6mQTKGyPQGw3epD9w-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-with-the-case-n_YwGd_KZ9Q4yvSNx3Z7OXow_mviTf6mQTKGyPQGw3epD9w-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-with-the-case-n_YwGd_KZ9Q4yvSNx3Z7OXow_mviTf6mQTKGyPQGw3epD9w.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/satish-chander-ahuja-v-sneha-ahuja-2021-case-summary\/\" title=\"Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja 2021 (Case Summary)\">Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja 2021 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India broadened the scope of the domestic violence law by recognizing the...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/satish-chander-ahuja-v-sneha-ahuja-2021-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-3004 category-family-law tags-hindu-marriage-act-1955\" data-id=\"3004\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/jai-singh-v-shakuntala-2002-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-case-summary-the_LCLwfJAJR7C5JXiTbtF_zA_ZzA3gAduQYyvoBGtUT7UcQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3006\" alt=\"Jai Singh v. Shakuntala AIR 2002 SC 1428\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-case-summary-the_LCLwfJAJR7C5JXiTbtF_zA_ZzA3gAduQYyvoBGtUT7UcQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-case-summary-the_LCLwfJAJR7C5JXiTbtF_zA_ZzA3gAduQYyvoBGtUT7UcQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-case-summary-the_LCLwfJAJR7C5JXiTbtF_zA_ZzA3gAduQYyvoBGtUT7UcQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-case-summary-the_LCLwfJAJR7C5JXiTbtF_zA_ZzA3gAduQYyvoBGtUT7UcQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-case-summary-the_LCLwfJAJR7C5JXiTbtF_zA_ZzA3gAduQYyvoBGtUT7UcQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/jai-singh-v-shakuntala-2002-case-summary\/\" title=\"Jai Singh v. Shakuntala 2002 (Case Summary)\">Jai Singh v. Shakuntala 2002 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India examined the scope of the statutory presumption under Section 16 of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/jai-singh-v-shakuntala-2002-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2996 category-family-law tags-bigamy-hindu-marriage-act-1955-section-494-ipc\" data-id=\"2996\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/s-nagalingam-v-sivagami-2001-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-a-family-law_x0eYoI6oRSqUY4ZGYYOnKQ_0J9hrtTGSeS_Yf67g4wtbg-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2999\" alt=\"S. Nagalingam v. Sivagami AIR 2001 SC 3567\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-a-family-law_x0eYoI6oRSqUY4ZGYYOnKQ_0J9hrtTGSeS_Yf67g4wtbg-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-a-family-law_x0eYoI6oRSqUY4ZGYYOnKQ_0J9hrtTGSeS_Yf67g4wtbg-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-a-family-law_x0eYoI6oRSqUY4ZGYYOnKQ_0J9hrtTGSeS_Yf67g4wtbg-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-a-family-law_x0eYoI6oRSqUY4ZGYYOnKQ_0J9hrtTGSeS_Yf67g4wtbg-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-illustration-of-a-family-law_x0eYoI6oRSqUY4ZGYYOnKQ_0J9hrtTGSeS_Yf67g4wtbg.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/s-nagalingam-v-sivagami-2001-case-summary\/\" title=\"S. Nagalingam v. Sivagami 2001 (Case Summary)\">S. Nagalingam v. Sivagami 2001 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case the Supreme Court dealt with the issue of bigamy under Section 494 IPC (Now Section 82 of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/s-nagalingam-v-sivagami-2001-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2980 category-family-law tags-hindu-marriage-act-1955-maintenance-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2980\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/mohd-ahmed-khan-v-shah-bano-begum-1985-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-gavel-and_UtfiBwi8RJ6pCumdkVEX5w_85ZpGWULSeuC0MAeuRdYuw1-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3085\" alt=\"Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum AIR 1985 SC 945\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-gavel-and_UtfiBwi8RJ6pCumdkVEX5w_85ZpGWULSeuC0MAeuRdYuw1-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-gavel-and_UtfiBwi8RJ6pCumdkVEX5w_85ZpGWULSeuC0MAeuRdYuw1-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-gavel-and_UtfiBwi8RJ6pCumdkVEX5w_85ZpGWULSeuC0MAeuRdYuw1-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-gavel-and_UtfiBwi8RJ6pCumdkVEX5w_85ZpGWULSeuC0MAeuRdYuw1-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-gavel-and_UtfiBwi8RJ6pCumdkVEX5w_85ZpGWULSeuC0MAeuRdYuw1.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/mohd-ahmed-khan-v-shah-bano-begum-1985-case-summary\/\" title=\"Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum 1985 (Case Summary)\">Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum 1985 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In the landmark case of Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, the Supreme Court of India addressed the issue...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/mohd-ahmed-khan-v-shah-bano-begum-1985-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2973 category-family-law tags-divorce-hindu-marriage-act-1955-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2973\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/smt-saroj-rani-vs-sudarshan-kumar-chadha-1984-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1007\" height=\"415\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2025-01-03-221946.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2986\" alt=\"Smt. Saroj Rani vs Sudarshan Kumar Chadha 1984 AIR 1562\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2025-01-03-221946.png 1007w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2025-01-03-221946-300x124.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2025-01-03-221946-150x62.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Screenshot-2025-01-03-221946-768x317.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1007px) 100vw, 1007px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/smt-saroj-rani-vs-sudarshan-kumar-chadha-1984-case-summary\/\" title=\"Smt. Saroj Rani vs Sudarshan Kumar Chadha 1984 (Case Summary)\">Smt. Saroj Rani vs Sudarshan Kumar Chadha 1984 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this significant case, The Supreme Court of India addressed key legal issues relating to the decree of restitution of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/smt-saroj-rani-vs-sudarshan-kumar-chadha-1984-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2952 category-family-law tags-hindu-marriage-act-1955-maintenance-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2952\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/neeta-rakesh-jain-v-rakesh-jeetmal-jain-2010-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-digital-illustration-of-the-indian-sup_Ry_vczPFRoqNpHrKAQi1-Q_5jP40vDuTBCsY57i2fz6vA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2968\" alt=\"Neeta Rakesh Jain v Rakesh Jeetmal Jain AIR 2010 SC 3540\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-digital-illustration-of-the-indian-sup_Ry_vczPFRoqNpHrKAQi1-Q_5jP40vDuTBCsY57i2fz6vA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-digital-illustration-of-the-indian-sup_Ry_vczPFRoqNpHrKAQi1-Q_5jP40vDuTBCsY57i2fz6vA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-digital-illustration-of-the-indian-sup_Ry_vczPFRoqNpHrKAQi1-Q_5jP40vDuTBCsY57i2fz6vA-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-digital-illustration-of-the-indian-sup_Ry_vczPFRoqNpHrKAQi1-Q_5jP40vDuTBCsY57i2fz6vA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-digital-illustration-of-the-indian-sup_Ry_vczPFRoqNpHrKAQi1-Q_5jP40vDuTBCsY57i2fz6vA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/neeta-rakesh-jain-v-rakesh-jeetmal-jain-2010-case-summary\/\" title=\"Neeta Rakesh Jain v Rakesh Jeetmal Jain 2010 (Case Summary)\">Neeta Rakesh Jain v Rakesh Jeetmal Jain 2010 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India addressed the question of fair interim maintenance under Section 24 of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/neeta-rakesh-jain-v-rakesh-jeetmal-jain-2010-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2958 category-family-law tags-divorce-hindu-marriage-act-1955-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2958\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/hitesh-bhatnagar-v-deepa-bhatnagar-2011case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-background-of-the-indian-supreme-court_M_CY6MgvSOuikIecuwalSw_Ej7_VfwjRwWRDEQFKpfS7Q-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2961\" alt=\"Hitesh Bhatnagar v Deepa Bhatnagar AIR2011 SC637\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-background-of-the-indian-supreme-court_M_CY6MgvSOuikIecuwalSw_Ej7_VfwjRwWRDEQFKpfS7Q-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-background-of-the-indian-supreme-court_M_CY6MgvSOuikIecuwalSw_Ej7_VfwjRwWRDEQFKpfS7Q-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-background-of-the-indian-supreme-court_M_CY6MgvSOuikIecuwalSw_Ej7_VfwjRwWRDEQFKpfS7Q-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-background-of-the-indian-supreme-court_M_CY6MgvSOuikIecuwalSw_Ej7_VfwjRwWRDEQFKpfS7Q-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-background-of-the-indian-supreme-court_M_CY6MgvSOuikIecuwalSw_Ej7_VfwjRwWRDEQFKpfS7Q.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/hitesh-bhatnagar-v-deepa-bhatnagar-2011case-summary\/\" title=\"Hitesh Bhatnagar v Deepa Bhatnagar 2011(Case Summary)\">Hitesh Bhatnagar v Deepa Bhatnagar 2011(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In the case of Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, the Supreme Court of India dealt with the issue of withdrawal...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/hitesh-bhatnagar-v-deepa-bhatnagar-2011case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2944 category-family-law tags-hindu-marriage-act-1955-maintenance-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2944\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/ramesh-chandra-daga-v-rameshwari-daga-2005case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-plainti_RvdTmTOjQN2DdDA3-cMmrQ_I6tFRgDlQ-maAnjJRI4zHA1-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-3089\" alt=\"Ramesh Chandra Daga v Rameshwari Daga AIR 2005 SC422\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-plainti_RvdTmTOjQN2DdDA3-cMmrQ_I6tFRgDlQ-maAnjJRI4zHA1-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-plainti_RvdTmTOjQN2DdDA3-cMmrQ_I6tFRgDlQ-maAnjJRI4zHA1-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-plainti_RvdTmTOjQN2DdDA3-cMmrQ_I6tFRgDlQ-maAnjJRI4zHA1-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-plainti_RvdTmTOjQN2DdDA3-cMmrQ_I6tFRgDlQ-maAnjJRI4zHA1-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-plainti_RvdTmTOjQN2DdDA3-cMmrQ_I6tFRgDlQ-maAnjJRI4zHA1.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/ramesh-chandra-daga-v-rameshwari-daga-2005case-summary\/\" title=\"Ramesh Chandra Daga v Rameshwari Daga 2005(Case Summary)\">Ramesh Chandra Daga v Rameshwari Daga 2005(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this notable case, the Supreme Court dealt with the complex issue of maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/ramesh-chandra-daga-v-rameshwari-daga-2005case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2935 category-family-law tags-section-125-crpc-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2935\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/badshah-v-sou-urmila-badshah-godse-and-another-2014-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-courtroom-with-a_008GcgplSyqOpoC3-ZhCsg_Yr2-a7woQne4RHHqYuO_Ng-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2938\" alt=\"Badshah v Sou Urmila Badshah Godse and Another (2014) 1 SCC 188\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-courtroom-with-a_008GcgplSyqOpoC3-ZhCsg_Yr2-a7woQne4RHHqYuO_Ng-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-courtroom-with-a_008GcgplSyqOpoC3-ZhCsg_Yr2-a7woQne4RHHqYuO_Ng-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-courtroom-with-a_008GcgplSyqOpoC3-ZhCsg_Yr2-a7woQne4RHHqYuO_Ng-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-courtroom-with-a_008GcgplSyqOpoC3-ZhCsg_Yr2-a7woQne4RHHqYuO_Ng-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-family-law-courtroom-with-a_008GcgplSyqOpoC3-ZhCsg_Yr2-a7woQne4RHHqYuO_Ng.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/badshah-v-sou-urmila-badshah-godse-and-another-2014-case-summary\/\" title=\"Badshah v Sou Urmila Badshah Godse and Another 2014 (Case Summary)\">Badshah v Sou Urmila Badshah Godse and Another 2014 (Case<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India expanded the interpretation of \"wife\" under Section 125 of the Criminal...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/badshah-v-sou-urmila-badshah-godse-and-another-2014-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2927 category-family-law tags-bigamy-hindu-marriage-act-1955-section-494-ipc-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2927\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/bhaurao-shankar-lokhande-v-state-of-maharashtra-1965-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-family-law-case-with-the-case-name-bha__FKVi1mYSOKp_P3m0FzfrQ_engvBqbLS1-FrB0R68zlxQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2929\" alt=\"Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1965 SC 1564\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-family-law-case-with-the-case-name-bha__FKVi1mYSOKp_P3m0FzfrQ_engvBqbLS1-FrB0R68zlxQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-family-law-case-with-the-case-name-bha__FKVi1mYSOKp_P3m0FzfrQ_engvBqbLS1-FrB0R68zlxQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-family-law-case-with-the-case-name-bha__FKVi1mYSOKp_P3m0FzfrQ_engvBqbLS1-FrB0R68zlxQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-family-law-case-with-the-case-name-bha__FKVi1mYSOKp_P3m0FzfrQ_engvBqbLS1-FrB0R68zlxQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-family-law-case-with-the-case-name-bha__FKVi1mYSOKp_P3m0FzfrQ_engvBqbLS1-FrB0R68zlxQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/bhaurao-shankar-lokhande-v-state-of-maharashtra-1965-case-summary\/\" title=\"Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra 1965 (Case Summary)\">Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra 1965 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India clarified the conditions required for the offence of bigamy under Section...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/bhaurao-shankar-lokhande-v-state-of-maharashtra-1965-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2909 category-family-law tags-bigamy-hindu-marriage-act-1955-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2909\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/dr-a-n-mukerji-vs-state-1969-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-lawy_HUXslWlnSiKoAgd48aWnGA_RCJlAiyxShuZqh30fvsdfA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2911\" alt=\"Dr. A.N. Mukerji vs State\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-lawy_HUXslWlnSiKoAgd48aWnGA_RCJlAiyxShuZqh30fvsdfA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-lawy_HUXslWlnSiKoAgd48aWnGA_RCJlAiyxShuZqh30fvsdfA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-lawy_HUXslWlnSiKoAgd48aWnGA_RCJlAiyxShuZqh30fvsdfA-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-lawy_HUXslWlnSiKoAgd48aWnGA_RCJlAiyxShuZqh30fvsdfA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-lawy_HUXslWlnSiKoAgd48aWnGA_RCJlAiyxShuZqh30fvsdfA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/dr-a-n-mukerji-vs-state-1969-case-summary\/\" title=\"Dr. A.N. Mukerji vs State 1968 (Case Summary)\">Dr. A.N. Mukerji vs State 1968 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In a complex case filled with allegations of deceit, manipulation, and breach of trust, the Allahabad High Court in 1968...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/dr-a-n-mukerji-vs-state-1969-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2841 category-family-law tags-bigamy-hindu-marriage-act-1955-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2841\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/a-subhash-babu-v-state-of-ap-2011-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"450\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/A.-Subhash-Babu-v.-State-of-AP-AIR-2011-SC-3031-1024x450.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2844\" alt=\"A. Subhash Babu v. State of AP AIR 2011 SC 3031\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/A.-Subhash-Babu-v.-State-of-AP-AIR-2011-SC-3031-1024x450.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/A.-Subhash-Babu-v.-State-of-AP-AIR-2011-SC-3031-300x132.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/A.-Subhash-Babu-v.-State-of-AP-AIR-2011-SC-3031-150x66.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/A.-Subhash-Babu-v.-State-of-AP-AIR-2011-SC-3031-768x338.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/A.-Subhash-Babu-v.-State-of-AP-AIR-2011-SC-3031.png 1253w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/a-subhash-babu-v-state-of-ap-2011-case-summary\/\" title=\"A. Subhash Babu v. State of AP 2011(Case Summary)\">A. Subhash Babu v. State of AP 2011(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India addressed the legality of criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 494, 495,...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/a-subhash-babu-v-state-of-ap-2011-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2832 category-family-law tags-bigamy-hindu-marriage-act-1955-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2832\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/surajmani-stella-kujur-v-duga-charan-hansdah-2001-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-long-table_hIt0Dq68Qn-NUmaaEeD6cQ_DT_KOEMpQOS8FJG-PQpW_w-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2834\" alt=\"Surajmani Stella Kujur v. Duga Charan Hansdah AIR 2001 SC 938\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-long-table_hIt0Dq68Qn-NUmaaEeD6cQ_DT_KOEMpQOS8FJG-PQpW_w-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-long-table_hIt0Dq68Qn-NUmaaEeD6cQ_DT_KOEMpQOS8FJG-PQpW_w-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-long-table_hIt0Dq68Qn-NUmaaEeD6cQ_DT_KOEMpQOS8FJG-PQpW_w-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-long-table_hIt0Dq68Qn-NUmaaEeD6cQ_DT_KOEMpQOS8FJG-PQpW_w-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-long-table_hIt0Dq68Qn-NUmaaEeD6cQ_DT_KOEMpQOS8FJG-PQpW_w.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/surajmani-stella-kujur-v-duga-charan-hansdah-2001-case-summary\/\" title=\"Surajmani Stella Kujur v. Duga Charan Hansdah 2001 (Case Summary)\">Surajmani Stella Kujur v. Duga Charan Hansdah 2001 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India clarified the applicability of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, to Scheduled...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/surajmani-stella-kujur-v-duga-charan-hansdah-2001-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2818 category-family-law tags-article-14-article-15-article-21-article-25-supreme-court-talaq-e-biddat-triple-talaq\" data-id=\"2818\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shayara-bano-v-union-of-india-2017-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitting-at-the-NBjwCJEJTVCeW9CJS9ioqg-NcF80ctnSoWkUf8a_AFusA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2821\" alt=\"Shayara Bano v. Union of India AIR 2017 SC 4609\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitting-at-the-NBjwCJEJTVCeW9CJS9ioqg-NcF80ctnSoWkUf8a_AFusA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitting-at-the-NBjwCJEJTVCeW9CJS9ioqg-NcF80ctnSoWkUf8a_AFusA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitting-at-the-NBjwCJEJTVCeW9CJS9ioqg-NcF80ctnSoWkUf8a_AFusA-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitting-at-the-NBjwCJEJTVCeW9CJS9ioqg-NcF80ctnSoWkUf8a_AFusA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitting-at-the-NBjwCJEJTVCeW9CJS9ioqg-NcF80ctnSoWkUf8a_AFusA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shayara-bano-v-union-of-india-2017-case-summary\/\" title=\"Shayara Bano v. Union of India 2017 (Case Summary)\">Shayara Bano v. Union of India 2017 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India declared the practice of instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) unconstitutional. The decision...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/shayara-bano-v-union-of-india-2017-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-2807 category-family-law tags-article-14-article-21-supreme-court\" data-id=\"2807\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-2018-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold-text-in-t-Uz_MS-E4TYuEXSazn8luvA-LfYtvUhAQ4iCyMqhVhCEFQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-2812\" alt=\"Shayara Bano v. Union of India AIR 2017 SC 4609\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold-text-in-t-Uz_MS-E4TYuEXSazn8luvA-LfYtvUhAQ4iCyMqhVhCEFQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold-text-in-t-Uz_MS-E4TYuEXSazn8luvA-LfYtvUhAQ4iCyMqhVhCEFQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold-text-in-t-Uz_MS-E4TYuEXSazn8luvA-LfYtvUhAQ4iCyMqhVhCEFQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold-text-in-t-Uz_MS-E4TYuEXSazn8luvA-LfYtvUhAQ4iCyMqhVhCEFQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-large-bold-text-in-t-Uz_MS-E4TYuEXSazn8luvA-LfYtvUhAQ4iCyMqhVhCEFQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-2018-case-summary\/\" title=\"Joseph Shine v. Union of India 2018 (Case Summary)\">Joseph Shine v. Union of India 2018 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India struck down Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/joseph-shine-v-union-of-india-2018-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-745 category-family-law tags-article-14-article-21-supreme-court\" data-id=\"745\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/sarla-mudgal-vs-union-of-india-1995-3-scc-635-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in-the-foreg-VYeKgiK8RpyAGSJRe_54Qw-oZfJJxV1QWKHGx_z0L21HA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-821\" alt=\"Sarla Mudgal vs Union of India\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in-the-foreg-VYeKgiK8RpyAGSJRe_54Qw-oZfJJxV1QWKHGx_z0L21HA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in-the-foreg-VYeKgiK8RpyAGSJRe_54Qw-oZfJJxV1QWKHGx_z0L21HA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in-the-foreg-VYeKgiK8RpyAGSJRe_54Qw-oZfJJxV1QWKHGx_z0L21HA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-photo-of-the-supreme-court-of-india-in-the-foreg-VYeKgiK8RpyAGSJRe_54Qw-oZfJJxV1QWKHGx_z0L21HA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/sarla-mudgal-vs-union-of-india-1995-3-scc-635-case-summary\/\" title=\"Sarla Mudgal vs Union of India (1995) (Case Summary)\">Sarla Mudgal vs Union of India (1995) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In the Sarla Mudgal vs. Union of India case, the Supreme Court addressed the critical issue of religious conversion and...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/sarla-mudgal-vs-union-of-india-1995-3-scc-635-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-735 category-family-law tags-article-14-article-21-supreme-court\" data-id=\"735\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/danial-latifi-anr-v-union-of-india-air-2001-sc-3958-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-of-the-case-danial-latifi-vs-union-of-ind-4o9CU6Q8SY-uXGlxJQHo-A-ZKQNeYwrS-11HZ8BlKF5Q-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-825\" alt=\"Danial Latifi &amp; Anr. v. Union of India\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-of-the-case-danial-latifi-vs-union-of-ind-4o9CU6Q8SY-uXGlxJQHo-A-ZKQNeYwrS-11HZ8BlKF5Q-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-of-the-case-danial-latifi-vs-union-of-ind-4o9CU6Q8SY-uXGlxJQHo-A-ZKQNeYwrS-11HZ8BlKF5Q-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-of-the-case-danial-latifi-vs-union-of-ind-4o9CU6Q8SY-uXGlxJQHo-A-ZKQNeYwrS-11HZ8BlKF5Q-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-of-the-case-danial-latifi-vs-union-of-ind-4o9CU6Q8SY-uXGlxJQHo-A-ZKQNeYwrS-11HZ8BlKF5Q.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/danial-latifi-anr-v-union-of-india-air-2001-sc-3958-case-summary\/\" title=\"Danial Latifi &#038; Anr. v. Union of India (2001) (Case Summary)\">Danial Latifi &#038; Anr. v. Union of India (2001) (Case<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case of Danial Latifi & Anr. v. Union of India revolved around the constitutional validity and interpretation of the...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/danial-latifi-anr-v-union-of-india-air-2001-sc-3958-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-718 category-family-law tags-article-25-supreme-court\" data-id=\"718\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/lily-thomas-vs-union-of-india-air-2000-sc-1650-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/lilly-thomas-imge-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-786\" alt=\"Lily Thomas vs Union of India\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/lilly-thomas-imge-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/lilly-thomas-imge-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/lilly-thomas-imge-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/lilly-thomas-imge.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/lily-thomas-vs-union-of-india-air-2000-sc-1650-case-summary\/\" title=\"Lily Thomas vs. Union of India (2000) (Case Summary) \u200b\">Lily Thomas vs. Union of India (2000) (Case Summary) \u200b<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case of Lily Thomas vs. Union of India tackled the misuse of religious conversion as a way to bypass...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/lily-thomas-vs-union-of-india-air-2000-sc-1650-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-79 category-family-law tags-national-legal-services-authority-v-union-of-india-2014\" data-id=\"79\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/corbett-v-corbett-1970-2-all-er-33case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-with-the-text-corbett-v-corbett-a-family-Fa_M72yzSGKVvpUiaRz9gQ-zbs6DzbsTnadmQKYHOg8Xw-1-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-371\" alt=\"Corbett v. Corbett: A Family Law Case\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-with-the-text-corbett-v-corbett-a-family-Fa_M72yzSGKVvpUiaRz9gQ-zbs6DzbsTnadmQKYHOg8Xw-1-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-with-the-text-corbett-v-corbett-a-family-Fa_M72yzSGKVvpUiaRz9gQ-zbs6DzbsTnadmQKYHOg8Xw-1-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-with-the-text-corbett-v-corbett-a-family-Fa_M72yzSGKVvpUiaRz9gQ-zbs6DzbsTnadmQKYHOg8Xw-1-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/10\/a-poster-with-the-text-corbett-v-corbett-a-family-Fa_M72yzSGKVvpUiaRz9gQ-zbs6DzbsTnadmQKYHOg8Xw-1.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/corbett-v-corbett-1970-2-all-er-33case-summary\/\" title=\"Corbett v. Corbett (1970)\u200b(Case Summary)\">Corbett v. Corbett (1970)\u200b(Case Summary) <\/br> <\/br><\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark case in the UK questioned the validity of a marriage involving a transgender woman who had undergone gender...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/corbett-v-corbett-1970-2-all-er-33case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><\/div>\n            <div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-4d56fd4 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"4d56fd4\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-ede94b4\" data-id=\"ede94b4\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8a4abbe elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-fancy-text\" data-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"eael-fancy-text.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t<div  class=\"eael-fancy-text-container style-1\" data-fancy-text-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-fancy-text=\"|     to come...\" data-fancy-text-transition-type=\"typing\" data-fancy-text-speed=\"50\" data-fancy-text-delay=\"2500\" data-fancy-text-cursor=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-loop=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-action=\"page_load\" >\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"eael-fancy-text-prefix\">And a lot more <\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<span id=\"eael-fancy-text-8a4abbe\" class=\"eael-fancy-text-strings solid-color\">\n\t\t\t\t<noscript>\n\t\t\t\t\t     to come...\t\t\t\t<\/noscript>\n\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div><!-- close .eael-fancy-text-container -->\n\n\t<div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Family Law Adiveppa v. Bhimappa 2017 (Case Summary)\u200b This case involves a dispute over ancestral property between members of a Hindu joint family. The Supreme Court ruled on&#8230; Read More Prakash vs Phulavati AIR 2016 SC 769 (Case Summary)\u200b This case, decided by the Supreme Court of India, involved the interpretation of the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, particularly&#8230; Read More Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma 2020 9 SCC 576 (Case In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India upheld the equal rights of daughters in Hindu Undivided Family (HUF)&#8230; Read More State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali AIR 1952 Bom This landmark case addressed the conflict between personal laws and constitutional mandates in India. The Bombay High Court addressed on&#8230; Read More Seema v Ashwani Kumar 2006 (Case Summary) The Supreme Court of India emphasized the importance of compulsory registration of marriages to address issues such as child marriage&#8230; Read More Shamim Ara v State of UP and Anr. 2002 (Case In this judgment, the Supreme Court of India addressed the validity of triple talaq and clarified the requirements for a&#8230; Read More Shobha Rani v Madhukar Reddy 1988 (Case Summary) The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of cruelty in matrimonial cases and clarified that demanding dowry constitutes cruelty,&#8230; Read More Noor Saba Khatoon v. Mohd. Quasim 1997(Case Summary) The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of a Muslim father\u2019s obligation to provide maintenance for his minor children,&#8230; Read More Rameshwari Devi v. State of Bihar 2000 (Case Summary) In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India the Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of entitlement to&#8230; Read More Vishnu Dutt Sharma v. Manju Sharma 2009(Case Summary) In this case, the Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of divorce on the grounds of cruelty and irretrievable&#8230; Read More Rajnesh v. Neha 2021 (Case Summary) In this significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India laid down comprehensive guidelines on the payment of maintenance in matrimonial&#8230; Read More Khazan Singh v. Union of India 1980 (Case Summary) In a landmark case that delves into the intricate relationship between adoption and caste status in India. The case of&#8230; Read More Harvinder Kaur vs. Harminder Singh Chaudhary 1984 (Case Summary) In the landmark case of Delhi High Court challenges the roots of a matrimonial relationship. It dealt with the issues&#8230; Read More Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja 2021 (Case Summary) In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India broadened the scope of the domestic violence law by recognizing the&#8230; Read More Jai Singh v. Shakuntala 2002 (Case Summary) In this significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India examined the scope of the statutory presumption under Section 16 of&#8230; Read More S. Nagalingam v. Sivagami 2001 (Case Summary) In this case the Supreme Court dealt with the issue of bigamy under Section 494 IPC (Now Section 82 of&#8230; Read More Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum 1985 (Case Summary) In the landmark case of Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, the Supreme Court of India addressed the issue&#8230; Read More Smt. Saroj Rani vs Sudarshan Kumar Chadha 1984 (Case Summary) In this significant case, The Supreme Court of India addressed key legal issues relating to the decree of restitution of&#8230; Read More Neeta Rakesh Jain v Rakesh Jeetmal Jain 2010 (Case Summary) In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India addressed the question of fair interim maintenance under Section 24 of&#8230; Read More Hitesh Bhatnagar v Deepa Bhatnagar 2011(Case Summary) In the case of Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, the Supreme Court of India dealt with the issue of withdrawal&#8230; Read More Ramesh Chandra Daga v Rameshwari Daga 2005(Case Summary) In this notable case, the Supreme Court dealt with the complex issue of maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu&#8230; Read More Badshah v Sou Urmila Badshah Godse and Another 2014 (Case In this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India expanded the interpretation of &quot;wife&quot; under Section 125 of the Criminal&#8230; Read More Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v. State of Maharashtra 1965 (Case Summary) In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India clarified the conditions required for the offence of bigamy under Section&#8230; Read More Dr. A.N. Mukerji vs State 1968 (Case Summary) In a complex case filled with allegations of deceit, manipulation, and breach of trust, the Allahabad High Court in 1968&#8230; Read More A. Subhash Babu v. State of AP 2011(Case Summary) In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India addressed the legality of criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 494, 495,&#8230; Read More Surajmani Stella Kujur v. Duga Charan Hansdah 2001 (Case Summary) In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court of India clarified the applicability of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, to Scheduled&#8230; Read More Shayara Bano v. Union of India 2017 (Case Summary) This landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India declared the practice of instant triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) unconstitutional. The decision&#8230; Read More Joseph Shine v. Union of India 2018 (Case Summary) In this landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India struck down Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which&#8230; Read More Sarla Mudgal vs Union of India (1995) (Case Summary) In the Sarla Mudgal vs. Union of India case, the Supreme Court addressed the critical issue of religious conversion and&#8230; Read More Danial Latifi &#038; Anr. v. Union of India (2001) (Case The case of Danial Latifi &amp; Anr. v. Union of India revolved around the constitutional validity and interpretation of the&#8230; Read More Lily Thomas vs. Union of India (2000) (Case Summary) \u200b The case of Lily Thomas vs. Union of India tackled the misuse of religious conversion as a way to bypass&#8230; Read More Corbett v. Corbett (1970)\u200b(Case Summary) This landmark case in the UK questioned the validity of a marriage involving a transgender woman who had undergone gender&#8230; Read More And a lot more to come&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"elementor_header_footer","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"no-sidebar","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"full-width-container","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"disabled","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2622","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2622"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2622\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4869,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2622\/revisions\/4869"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}