{"id":2628,"date":"2024-11-24T06:16:43","date_gmt":"2024-11-24T06:16:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/?page_id=2628"},"modified":"2025-02-12T21:41:42","modified_gmt":"2025-02-12T16:11:42","slug":"constitutional-law","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Constitutional Law"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-page\" data-elementor-id=\"2628\" class=\"elementor elementor-2628\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-ce37983 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"ce37983\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-525956c\" data-id=\"525956c\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d6987e9 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"d6987e9\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Constitutional Law<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8118200 elementor-widget-divider--separator-type-pattern elementor-widget-divider--no-spacing elementor-widget-divider--view-line elementor-widget elementor-widget-divider\" data-id=\"8118200\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"divider.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-divider\" style=\"--divider-pattern-url: url(&quot;data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns=&#039;http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg&#039; preserveAspectRatio=&#039;none&#039; overflow=&#039;visible&#039; height=&#039;100%&#039; viewBox=&#039;0 0 24 24&#039; fill=&#039;black&#039; stroke=&#039;none&#039;%3E%3Cpath d=&#039;M24,8v12H0V8H24z M24,4v1H0V4H24z&#039;\/%3E%3C\/svg%3E&quot;);\">\n\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-divider-separator\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0aebdab elementor-widget__width-inherit elementor-grid-eael-col-4 elementor-grid-tablet-eael-col-2 elementor-grid-mobile-eael-col-1 elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-post-grid\" data-id=\"0aebdab\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-settings=\"{&quot;eael_post_grid_columns&quot;:&quot;eael-col-4&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_tablet&quot;:&quot;eael-col-2&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_mobile&quot;:&quot;eael-col-1&quot;}\" data-widget_type=\"eael-post-grid.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div id=\"eael-post-grid-0aebdab\" class=\"eael-post-grid-container\">\n            <div class=\"eael-post-grid eael-post-appender eael-post-appender-0aebdab eael-post-grid-style-one\" data-layout-mode=\"masonry\"><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4768 category-constitutional-law tags-article-14-supreme-court\" data-id=\"4768\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/kathi-raning-rawat-v-state-of-saurashtra-air-1952-sc-123-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vector-illustration-of-a-courtroom-wit_jg5_6LUgTF2mpOVxuZc23Q_3GFD-3EaQW6mJURtbFXciA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4787\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vector-illustration-of-a-courtroom-wit_jg5_6LUgTF2mpOVxuZc23Q_3GFD-3EaQW6mJURtbFXciA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vector-illustration-of-a-courtroom-wit_jg5_6LUgTF2mpOVxuZc23Q_3GFD-3EaQW6mJURtbFXciA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vector-illustration-of-a-courtroom-wit_jg5_6LUgTF2mpOVxuZc23Q_3GFD-3EaQW6mJURtbFXciA-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vector-illustration-of-a-courtroom-wit_jg5_6LUgTF2mpOVxuZc23Q_3GFD-3EaQW6mJURtbFXciA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vector-illustration-of-a-courtroom-wit_jg5_6LUgTF2mpOVxuZc23Q_3GFD-3EaQW6mJURtbFXciA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/kathi-raning-rawat-v-state-of-saurashtra-air-1952-sc-123-case-summary\/\" title=\"Kathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra 1952 (Case Summary)\">Kathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra 1952 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 ez-toc-wrap-left counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/r-d-shetty-v-the-international-airport-authority-of-india-and-ord-1979-case-summary\/#Facts_of_R_D_Shetty_V_The_International_Airport_Authority_of_India\" >Facts of R. D. Shetty V. The International Airport Authority of India<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/r-d-shetty-v-the-international-airport-authority-of-india-and-ord-1979-case-summary\/#Issues_framed\" >Issues framed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/r-d-shetty-v-the-international-airport-authority-of-india-and-ord-1979-case-summary\/#Judgment_of_R_D_Shetty_V_The_International_Airport_Authority_of_India\" >Judgment of R. D. Shetty V. The International Airport Authority of India<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/r-d-shetty-v-the-international-airport-authority-of-india-and-ord-1979-case-summary\/#Click_here_to_read_the_Judgment\" >Click here to read the Judgment<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The Kathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra case deals with the scope and interpretation of Article 14 of the...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/kathi-raning-rawat-v-state-of-saurashtra-air-1952-sc-123-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4763 category-constitutional-law tags-article-13-article-19-supreme-court\" data-id=\"4763\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/bhikaji-narain-dhakras-and-others-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-open-to-a-page-wit_Dq3D0sUvSWayyixdDptPKg_qbmLpTgJTe-G7kRVelVx_g-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4776\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-open-to-a-page-wit_Dq3D0sUvSWayyixdDptPKg_qbmLpTgJTe-G7kRVelVx_g-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-open-to-a-page-wit_Dq3D0sUvSWayyixdDptPKg_qbmLpTgJTe-G7kRVelVx_g-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-open-to-a-page-wit_Dq3D0sUvSWayyixdDptPKg_qbmLpTgJTe-G7kRVelVx_g-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-open-to-a-page-wit_Dq3D0sUvSWayyixdDptPKg_qbmLpTgJTe-G7kRVelVx_g-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-open-to-a-page-wit_Dq3D0sUvSWayyixdDptPKg_qbmLpTgJTe-G7kRVelVx_g.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/bhikaji-narain-dhakras-and-others-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-case-summary\/\" title=\"Bhikaji Narain Dhakras and Others Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh and Another 1955 (Case Summary)\">Bhikaji Narain Dhakras and Others Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh and Another 1955 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case involves the interpretation of Article 13 and the doctrine of eclipse, which states that pre-constitutional laws rendered inoperative...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/bhikaji-narain-dhakras-and-others-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4747 category-constitutional-law tags-article-12-supreme-court\" data-id=\"4747\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/zee-telefilms-ltd-anr-vs-union-of-india-ors-2004-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photograph-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge_h3vwym3SRZmy7ZEiVaRJGA_HK9BnzTlRdiL3NwFU23Baw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4752\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photograph-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge_h3vwym3SRZmy7ZEiVaRJGA_HK9BnzTlRdiL3NwFU23Baw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photograph-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge_h3vwym3SRZmy7ZEiVaRJGA_HK9BnzTlRdiL3NwFU23Baw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photograph-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge_h3vwym3SRZmy7ZEiVaRJGA_HK9BnzTlRdiL3NwFU23Baw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photograph-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge_h3vwym3SRZmy7ZEiVaRJGA_HK9BnzTlRdiL3NwFU23Baw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photograph-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge_h3vwym3SRZmy7ZEiVaRJGA_HK9BnzTlRdiL3NwFU23Baw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/zee-telefilms-ltd-anr-vs-union-of-india-ors-2004-case-summary\/\" title=\"Zee Telefilms Ltd. &#038; Anr VS Union of India &#038; Ors 2004 (Case Summary)\">Zee Telefilms Ltd. &#038; Anr VS Union of India &#038; Ors 2004 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case addressed whether the BCCI qualifies as a \u2018State\u2019 under Article 12 of the Constitution, impacting judicial review of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/zee-telefilms-ltd-anr-vs-union-of-india-ors-2004-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4684 category-constitutional-law tags-article-14\" data-id=\"4684\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/state-of-west-bengal-v-anwar-ali-sarkar-air-1952-sc-75\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-opened-to-a-page-w_1aEp91tRTEyh2B8DBhsx-g_fk6_KgCtTQSLZC-vB2vobQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4695\" alt=\"State Of West Bengal V. Anwar Ali Sarkar, AIR 1952 SC 75\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-opened-to-a-page-w_1aEp91tRTEyh2B8DBhsx-g_fk6_KgCtTQSLZC-vB2vobQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-opened-to-a-page-w_1aEp91tRTEyh2B8DBhsx-g_fk6_KgCtTQSLZC-vB2vobQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-opened-to-a-page-w_1aEp91tRTEyh2B8DBhsx-g_fk6_KgCtTQSLZC-vB2vobQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-opened-to-a-page-w_1aEp91tRTEyh2B8DBhsx-g_fk6_KgCtTQSLZC-vB2vobQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-law-book-opened-to-a-page-w_1aEp91tRTEyh2B8DBhsx-g_fk6_KgCtTQSLZC-vB2vobQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/state-of-west-bengal-v-anwar-ali-sarkar-air-1952-sc-75\/\" title=\"State Of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (Case Summary)\">State Of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar case deals with the scope and interpretation of Article 14 of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/state-of-west-bengal-v-anwar-ali-sarkar-air-1952-sc-75\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1854 category-constitutional-law tags-article-22-cofeposa-act\" data-id=\"1854\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/ichhu-devi-choraria-v-union-of-india-ors-1980\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-case-law-ichhu-devi-chor-6XId8QhMTISi8iqCde3-kA-aBnpGo4XQoOs6SbWvS27Vg-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1862\" alt=\"ICHHU DEVI CHORARIA v. UNION OF INDIA &amp; ORS\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-case-law-ichhu-devi-chor-6XId8QhMTISi8iqCde3-kA-aBnpGo4XQoOs6SbWvS27Vg-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-case-law-ichhu-devi-chor-6XId8QhMTISi8iqCde3-kA-aBnpGo4XQoOs6SbWvS27Vg-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-case-law-ichhu-devi-chor-6XId8QhMTISi8iqCde3-kA-aBnpGo4XQoOs6SbWvS27Vg-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-case-law-ichhu-devi-chor-6XId8QhMTISi8iqCde3-kA-aBnpGo4XQoOs6SbWvS27Vg-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-case-law-ichhu-devi-chor-6XId8QhMTISi8iqCde3-kA-aBnpGo4XQoOs6SbWvS27Vg.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/ichhu-devi-choraria-v-union-of-india-ors-1980\/\" title=\"Ichhu Devi Choraria v. Union of India &#038; Ors 1980 (Case Summary)\">Ichhu Devi Choraria v. Union of India &#038; Ors 1980 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>Preventive detention lies at a crucial juncture between state\u2019s security and constitutional rights of the individuals, emphasizing the role of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/ichhu-devi-choraria-v-union-of-india-ors-1980\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1400 category-constitutional-law tags-article-12-supreme-court\" data-id=\"1400\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/ajay-hasia-etc-vs-khalid-mujib-sehravardi-ors-etc-1981-air-487-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Untitled_design_501-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1401\" alt=\"Ajay Hasia Etc. Vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi &amp; Ors. Etc. 1981 AIR 487\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Untitled_design_501-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Untitled_design_501-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Untitled_design_501-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Untitled_design_501-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Untitled_design_501.png 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/ajay-hasia-etc-vs-khalid-mujib-sehravardi-ors-etc-1981-air-487-case-summary\/\" title=\"Ajay Hasia Etc. Vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi &amp; Ors. Etc. (1981) (Case Summary)\">Ajay Hasia Etc. Vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi &amp; Ors. Etc. (1981) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this landmark ruling, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India broadened the definition of \u201cState\u201d under Article 12 of the...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/ajay-hasia-etc-vs-khalid-mujib-sehravardi-ors-etc-1981-air-487-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1393 category-constitutional-law tags-article-191g-article-21-article-48-article-51ag-supreme-court\" data-id=\"1393\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/state-of-gujarat-v-mirzapur-moti-kureshi-kassab-jamat-2005-scc-53\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.34.39_e37fd4bd-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1394\" alt=\"State of Gujarat V. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat 2005 SCC 53\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.34.39_e37fd4bd-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.34.39_e37fd4bd-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.34.39_e37fd4bd-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.34.39_e37fd4bd-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.34.39_e37fd4bd.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/state-of-gujarat-v-mirzapur-moti-kureshi-kassab-jamat-2005-scc-53\/\" title=\"State of Gujarat V. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat (2005) (Case Summary)\">State of Gujarat V. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat (2005) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this Landmark case, the Supreme Court of India adjudicated the constitutional validity of the Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment)...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/state-of-gujarat-v-mirzapur-moti-kureshi-kassab-jamat-2005-scc-53\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1385 category-constitutional-law tags-article-3-supreme-court\" data-id=\"1385\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/babulal-parate-v-the-state-of-bombay-and-another-1960-air-51-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.36.16_f4afd653-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1386\" alt=\"Babulal Parate V. The State of Bombay and Another 1960 AIR 51\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.36.16_f4afd653-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.36.16_f4afd653-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.36.16_f4afd653-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.36.16_f4afd653-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-21.36.16_f4afd653.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/babulal-parate-v-the-state-of-bombay-and-another-1960-air-51-case-summary\/\" title=\"Babulal Parate V. The State of Bombay and Another (1960) (Case Summary)\">Babulal Parate V. The State of Bombay and Another (1960) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case addresses the formation of a composite State of Bombay through the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, which deviated from...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/babulal-parate-v-the-state-of-bombay-and-another-1960-air-51-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1372 category-constitutional-law tags-article-12-supreme-court\" data-id=\"1372\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/r-d-shetty-v-the-international-airport-authority-of-india-and-ord-1979-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-22.00.19_472a418e-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1373\" alt=\"Ramana Dayaram Shetty V. The International Airport Authority Of India And Ord. 1979 AIR 1628\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-22.00.19_472a418e-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-22.00.19_472a418e-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-22.00.19_472a418e-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-22.00.19_472a418e-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2024-10-23-at-22.00.19_472a418e.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/r-d-shetty-v-the-international-airport-authority-of-india-and-ord-1979-case-summary\/\" title=\"R. D. Shetty V. The International Airport Authority of India and Ord. (1979) (Case Summary)\">R. D. Shetty V. The International Airport Authority of India and Ord. (1979) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this landmark ruling, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India broadened the definition of \u201cState\u201d under Article 12 of the...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/constitutional-law\/r-d-shetty-v-the-international-airport-authority-of-india-and-ord-1979-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><\/div>\n            <div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-4d56fd4 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"4d56fd4\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-ede94b4\" data-id=\"ede94b4\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8a4abbe elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-fancy-text\" data-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"eael-fancy-text.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t<div  class=\"eael-fancy-text-container style-1\" data-fancy-text-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-fancy-text=\"|     to come...\" data-fancy-text-transition-type=\"typing\" data-fancy-text-speed=\"50\" data-fancy-text-delay=\"2500\" data-fancy-text-cursor=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-loop=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-action=\"page_load\" >\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"eael-fancy-text-prefix\">And a lot more <\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<span id=\"eael-fancy-text-8a4abbe\" class=\"eael-fancy-text-strings solid-color\">\n\t\t\t\t<noscript>\n\t\t\t\t\t     to come...\t\t\t\t<\/noscript>\n\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div><!-- close .eael-fancy-text-container -->\n\n\t<div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Constitutional Law Kathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra, AIR 1952 SC 123 (Case Summary) The Kathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra case deals with the scope and interpretation of Article 14 of the&#8230; Read More Bhikaji Narain Dhakras and Others Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh and Another 1955 AIR 781 (Case Summary) This case involves the interpretation of Article 13 and the doctrine of eclipse, which states that pre-constitutional laws rendered inoperative&#8230; Read More Zee Telefilms Ltd. &#038; ANR VS Union of India &#038; ORS 541\/2004 (Case Summary) The case addressed whether the BCCI qualifies as a \u2018State\u2019 under Article 12 of the Constitution, impacting judicial review of&#8230; Read More State Of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar (Case Summary) The State of West Bengal v. Anwar Ali Sarkar case deals with the scope and interpretation of Article 14 of&#8230; Read More Ichhu Devi Choraria v. Union of India &#038; Ors 1980 (Case Summary) Preventive detention lies at a crucial juncture between state\u2019s security and constitutional rights of the individuals, emphasizing the role of&#8230; Read More Ajay Hasia Etc. Vs. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi &amp; Ors. Etc. (1981) (Case Summary) In this landmark ruling, the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court of India broadened the definition of \u201cState\u201d under Article 12 of the&#8230; Read More State of Gujarat V. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat (2005) (Case Summary) In this Landmark case, the Supreme Court of India adjudicated the constitutional validity of the Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment)&#8230; Read More Babulal Parate V. The State of Bombay and Another (1960) (Case Summary) The case addresses the formation of a composite State of Bombay through the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, which deviated from&#8230; Read More R. D. Shetty V. The International Airport Authority of India and Ord. (1979) (Case Summary) In this landmark ruling, the Hon&#039;ble Supreme Court of India broadened the definition of \u201cState\u201d under Article 12 of the&#8230; Read More And a lot more to come&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"elementor_header_footer","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"no-sidebar","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"full-width-container","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"disabled","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2628","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2628"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2628\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4793,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2628\/revisions\/4793"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}