{"id":2629,"date":"2024-11-24T06:17:32","date_gmt":"2024-11-24T06:17:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/?page_id=2629"},"modified":"2025-02-16T00:40:02","modified_gmt":"2025-02-15T19:10:02","slug":"company-law","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Company Law"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-page\" data-elementor-id=\"2629\" class=\"elementor elementor-2629\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-ce37983 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no\" data-id=\"ce37983\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-525956c\" data-id=\"525956c\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d6987e9 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"d6987e9\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Company Law<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8118200 elementor-widget-divider--separator-type-pattern elementor-widget-divider--no-spacing elementor-widget-divider--view-line elementor-widget elementor-widget-divider\" data-id=\"8118200\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"divider.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-divider\" style=\"--divider-pattern-url: url(&quot;data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns=&#039;http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg&#039; preserveAspectRatio=&#039;none&#039; overflow=&#039;visible&#039; height=&#039;100%&#039; viewBox=&#039;0 0 24 24&#039; fill=&#039;black&#039; stroke=&#039;none&#039;%3E%3Cpath d=&#039;M24,8v12H0V8H24z M24,4v1H0V4H24z&#039;\/%3E%3C\/svg%3E&quot;);\">\n\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-divider-separator\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0aebdab elementor-widget__width-inherit elementor-grid-eael-col-4 elementor-grid-tablet-eael-col-2 elementor-grid-mobile-eael-col-1 elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-post-grid\" data-id=\"0aebdab\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-settings=\"{&quot;eael_post_grid_columns&quot;:&quot;eael-col-4&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_tablet&quot;:&quot;eael-col-2&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_mobile&quot;:&quot;eael-col-1&quot;}\" data-widget_type=\"eael-post-grid.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div id=\"eael-post-grid-0aebdab\" class=\"eael-post-grid-container\">\n            <div class=\"eael-post-grid eael-post-appender eael-post-appender-0aebdab eael-post-grid-style-one\" data-layout-mode=\"masonry\"><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1680 category-company-law tags-doctrine-of-constructive-notice\" data-id=\"1680\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/kotla-venkataswamy-vs-chinta-ramamurthy-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seated-at-the-HK528GmQTDWZE3V7_Fk_OQ-doZV8kOYTUqIZymBanadXw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1681\" alt=\"Kotla Venkataswamy vs Chinta Ramamurthy\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seated-at-the-HK528GmQTDWZE3V7_Fk_OQ-doZV8kOYTUqIZymBanadXw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seated-at-the-HK528GmQTDWZE3V7_Fk_OQ-doZV8kOYTUqIZymBanadXw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seated-at-the-HK528GmQTDWZE3V7_Fk_OQ-doZV8kOYTUqIZymBanadXw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seated-at-the-HK528GmQTDWZE3V7_Fk_OQ-doZV8kOYTUqIZymBanadXw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-seated-at-the-HK528GmQTDWZE3V7_Fk_OQ-doZV8kOYTUqIZymBanadXw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/kotla-venkataswamy-vs-chinta-ramamurthy-case-summary\/\" title=\"Kotla Venkataswamy vs Chinta Ramamurthy (1934) (Case Summary)\">Kotla Venkataswamy vs Chinta Ramamurthy (1934) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark case of company law is a set case where the main issue revolves around the doctrine of constructive...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/kotla-venkataswamy-vs-chinta-ramamurthy-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1674 category-company-law tags-doctrine-of-constructive-notice\" data-id=\"1674\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/royal-british-bank-v-turquand-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-image-of-a-courtroom-setting-in-zp0KuZLER0-gNr6SH4SSjg-NQ1uH2-pTSC0yz41ZchTjA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1675\" alt=\"Royal British Bank v. Turquand\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-image-of-a-courtroom-setting-in-zp0KuZLER0-gNr6SH4SSjg-NQ1uH2-pTSC0yz41ZchTjA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-image-of-a-courtroom-setting-in-zp0KuZLER0-gNr6SH4SSjg-NQ1uH2-pTSC0yz41ZchTjA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-image-of-a-courtroom-setting-in-zp0KuZLER0-gNr6SH4SSjg-NQ1uH2-pTSC0yz41ZchTjA-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-image-of-a-courtroom-setting-in-zp0KuZLER0-gNr6SH4SSjg-NQ1uH2-pTSC0yz41ZchTjA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-image-of-a-courtroom-setting-in-zp0KuZLER0-gNr6SH4SSjg-NQ1uH2-pTSC0yz41ZchTjA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/royal-british-bank-v-turquand-case-summary\/\" title=\"Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856) (Case Summary)\">Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark case of company law establishes the doctrine of indoor management. Opposite to the doctrine of constructive notice, this...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/royal-british-bank-v-turquand-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1444 category-company-law tags-companies-act\" data-id=\"1444\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/ashbury-railway-carriage-and-iron-co-vs-riche-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ashbury-railway-Carriage-and-iron-Co.-vs-Riche-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1445\" alt=\"Ashbury railway Carriage and iron Co. vs Riche\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ashbury-railway-Carriage-and-iron-Co.-vs-Riche-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ashbury-railway-Carriage-and-iron-Co.-vs-Riche-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ashbury-railway-Carriage-and-iron-Co.-vs-Riche-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ashbury-railway-Carriage-and-iron-Co.-vs-Riche-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ashbury-railway-Carriage-and-iron-Co.-vs-Riche.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/ashbury-railway-carriage-and-iron-co-vs-riche-case-summary\/\" title=\"Ashbury railway Carriage and iron Co. vs Riche (1875) (case Summary)\">Ashbury railway Carriage and iron Co. vs Riche (1875) (case<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark case on doctrine on ultra vires strengthened the fundamental rule of company law that a company shall not...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/ashbury-railway-carriage-and-iron-co-vs-riche-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1438 category-company-law tags-companies-act\" data-id=\"1438\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/emile-erlanger-v-new-sombrero-phosphate-co-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Emile-Erlanger-v.-New-Sombrero-Phosphate-co-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1439\" alt=\"Emile Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate co.\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Emile-Erlanger-v.-New-Sombrero-Phosphate-co-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Emile-Erlanger-v.-New-Sombrero-Phosphate-co-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Emile-Erlanger-v.-New-Sombrero-Phosphate-co-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Emile-Erlanger-v.-New-Sombrero-Phosphate-co-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Emile-Erlanger-v.-New-Sombrero-Phosphate-co.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/emile-erlanger-v-new-sombrero-phosphate-co-case-summary\/\" title=\"Emile Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate co. (1878) (Case Summary)\">Emile Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate co. (1878) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This is a landmark English case law, on contract and company Law. The case emphasizes the legal position and fiduciary...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/emile-erlanger-v-new-sombrero-phosphate-co-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1432 category-company-law tags-companies-act\" data-id=\"1432\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/lee-v-lees-air-farming-ltd-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lee-v-Lees-Air-Farming-Ltd.--1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1433\" alt=\"Lee v Lee\u2019s Air Farming Ltd.\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lee-v-Lees-Air-Farming-Ltd.--1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lee-v-Lees-Air-Farming-Ltd.--300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lee-v-Lees-Air-Farming-Ltd.--150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lee-v-Lees-Air-Farming-Ltd.--768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lee-v-Lees-Air-Farming-Ltd.-.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/lee-v-lees-air-farming-ltd-case-summary\/\" title=\"Lee v Lee\u2019s Air Farming Ltd. (1960) (Case Summary)\">Lee v Lee\u2019s Air Farming Ltd. (1960) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case, also known as the case of Lee v Lee, is a landmark case that strengthened the principle of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/lee-v-lees-air-farming-ltd-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-1419 category-company-law tags-companies-act\" data-id=\"1419\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/salomon-v-salomon-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Salomon-v.-Salomon-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-1420\" alt=\"Salomon v. Salomon\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Salomon-v.-Salomon-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Salomon-v.-Salomon-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Salomon-v.-Salomon-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Salomon-v.-Salomon-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Salomon-v.-Salomon.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/salomon-v-salomon-case-summary\/\" title=\"Salomon v. Salomon (1897) (Case Summary)\">Salomon v. Salomon (1897) (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark ruling of 1897 the English court helped to establish the notion of separate legal entity. The case established...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/company-law\/salomon-v-salomon-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><\/div>\n            <div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-4d56fd4 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no\" data-id=\"4d56fd4\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-ede94b4\" data-id=\"ede94b4\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8a4abbe elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-fancy-text\" data-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"eael-fancy-text.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t<div  class=\"eael-fancy-text-container style-1\" data-fancy-text-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-fancy-text=\"|     to come...\" data-fancy-text-transition-type=\"typing\" data-fancy-text-speed=\"50\" data-fancy-text-delay=\"2500\" data-fancy-text-cursor=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-loop=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-action=\"page_load\" >\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"eael-fancy-text-prefix\">And a lot more <\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<span id=\"eael-fancy-text-8a4abbe\" class=\"eael-fancy-text-strings solid-color\">\n\t\t\t\t<noscript>\n\t\t\t\t\t     to come...\t\t\t\t<\/noscript>\n\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div><!-- close .eael-fancy-text-container -->\n\n\t<div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Company Law Kotla Venkataswamy vs Chinta Ramamurthy (1934) (Case Summary) This landmark case of company law is a set case where the main issue revolves around the doctrine of constructive&#8230; Read More Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856) (Case Summary) This landmark case of company law establishes the doctrine of indoor management. Opposite to the doctrine of constructive notice, this&#8230; Read More Ashbury railway Carriage and iron Co. vs Riche (1875) (case This landmark case on doctrine on ultra vires strengthened the fundamental rule of company law that a company shall not&#8230; Read More Emile Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate co. (1878) (Case Summary) This is a landmark English case law, on contract and company Law. The case emphasizes the legal position and fiduciary&#8230; Read More Lee v Lee\u2019s Air Farming Ltd. (1960) (Case Summary) This case, also known as the case of Lee v Lee, is a landmark case that strengthened the principle of&#8230; Read More Salomon v. Salomon (1897) (Case Summary) This landmark ruling of 1897 the English court helped to establish the notion of separate legal entity. The case established&#8230; Read More And a lot more to come&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"elementor_header_footer","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"no-sidebar","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"full-width-container","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"disabled","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","_members_access_role":[],"_members_access_error":""},"class_list":["post-2629","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2629"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2629\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4872,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2629\/revisions\/4872"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}