{"id":4504,"date":"2025-01-23T14:29:32","date_gmt":"2025-01-23T14:29:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/?page_id=4504"},"modified":"2025-04-15T14:40:33","modified_gmt":"2025-04-15T09:10:33","slug":"contract-law","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Contract Law"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-page\" data-elementor-id=\"4504\" class=\"elementor elementor-4504\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-ce37983 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"ce37983\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-525956c\" data-id=\"525956c\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d6987e9 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"d6987e9\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Contracts Law<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8118200 elementor-widget-divider--separator-type-pattern elementor-widget-divider--no-spacing elementor-widget-divider--view-line elementor-widget elementor-widget-divider\" data-id=\"8118200\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"divider.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-divider\" style=\"--divider-pattern-url: url(&quot;data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns=&#039;http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg&#039; preserveAspectRatio=&#039;none&#039; overflow=&#039;visible&#039; height=&#039;100%&#039; viewBox=&#039;0 0 24 24&#039; fill=&#039;black&#039; stroke=&#039;none&#039;%3E%3Cpath d=&#039;M24,8v12H0V8H24z M24,4v1H0V4H24z&#039;\/%3E%3C\/svg%3E&quot;);\">\n\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-divider-separator\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0aebdab elementor-widget__width-inherit elementor-grid-eael-col-4 elementor-grid-tablet-eael-col-2 elementor-grid-mobile-eael-col-1 elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-post-grid\" data-id=\"0aebdab\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-settings=\"{&quot;eael_post_grid_columns&quot;:&quot;eael-col-4&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_tablet&quot;:&quot;eael-col-2&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_mobile&quot;:&quot;eael-col-1&quot;}\" data-widget_type=\"eael-post-grid.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div id=\"eael-post-grid-0aebdab\" class=\"eael-post-grid-container\">\n            <div class=\"eael-post-grid eael-post-appender eael-post-appender-0aebdab eael-post-grid-style-one\" data-layout-mode=\"masonry\"><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5470 category-contract-law tags-consideration\" data-id=\"5470\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/kedar-nath-v-gorie-mohamed-1886-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-26-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5472\" alt=\"Kedar Nath v. Gorie Mohamed\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-26-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-26-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-26-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-26-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-26-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-26.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/kedar-nath-v-gorie-mohamed-1886-case-summary\/\" title=\"Kedar Nath v. Gorie Mohamed 1886 (Case Summary)\">Kedar Nath v. Gorie Mohamed 1886 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 ez-toc-wrap-left counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/mcgregor-v-mcgregor-1888-case-summary\/#Facts_of_McGregor_v_McGregor\" >Facts of McGregor v McGregor<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/mcgregor-v-mcgregor-1888-case-summary\/#Issues_framed\" >Issues framed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/mcgregor-v-mcgregor-1888-case-summary\/#Judgment_of_McGregor_v_McGregor\" >Judgment of McGregor v McGregor<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case established that promises made in subscription agreements for charitable purposes are enforceable if they induce reliance and result...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/kedar-nath-v-gorie-mohamed-1886-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5459 category-contract-law tags-acceptance-offer-privity-of-contract\" data-id=\"5459\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/boulton-v-jones-1857-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-25-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5461\" alt=\"Boulton v. Jones 1857\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-25-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-25-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-25-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-25-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-25-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-25.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/boulton-v-jones-1857-case-summary\/\" title=\"Boulton v. Jones 1857 (Case Summary)\">Boulton v. Jones 1857 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case the Court of Exchequer dealt with the principle of privity of contract and the identity of contracting...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/boulton-v-jones-1857-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5453 category-contract-law tags-mistake\" data-id=\"5453\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/raffles-v-wichelhaus-1864-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-24-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5454\" alt=\"Raffles v. Wichelhaus 1864\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-24-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-24-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-24-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-24-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-24-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-24.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/raffles-v-wichelhaus-1864-case-summary\/\" title=\"Raffles v. Wichelhaus 1864 (Case Summary)\">Raffles v. Wichelhaus 1864 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case, addressed the issue of mutual mistake in contract law. The case revolved around an ambiguous term in...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/raffles-v-wichelhaus-1864-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5447 category-contract-law tags-agreement-partnership\" data-id=\"5447\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/smith-v-anderson-1880\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-23-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5448\" alt=\"Smith v. Anderson 1880\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-23-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-23-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-23-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-23-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-23-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-23.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/smith-v-anderson-1880\/\" title=\"Smith v. Anderson 1880\">Smith v. Anderson 1880<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this landmark case, the English Court of Appeal addressed the question of whether a trust arrangement involving numerous beneficiaries...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/smith-v-anderson-1880\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5438 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"5438\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/ghaziabad-development-authority-v-union-of-india-2000-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-22-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5439\" alt=\"Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Balbir Singh\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-22-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-22-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-22-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-22-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-22-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-22.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/ghaziabad-development-authority-v-union-of-india-2000-case-summary\/\" title=\"Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Union of India 2000 (Case Summary)\">Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Union of India 2000 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case revolves around the Ghaziabad Development Authority\u2019s (GDA) failure to deliver possession in its housing schemes, specifically raising the...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/ghaziabad-development-authority-v-union-of-india-2000-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5431 category-contract-law tags-contract-mistake\" data-id=\"5431\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/haji-abdul-rahman-allarakhia-v-bombay-and-persia-steam-navigation-co-1892-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-21-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5432\" alt=\"Haji Abdul Rahman Allarakhia v. Bombay and Persia Steam Navigation Co.\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-21-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-21-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-21-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-21-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-21-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-21.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/haji-abdul-rahman-allarakhia-v-bombay-and-persia-steam-navigation-co-1892-case-summary\/\" title=\"Haji Abdul Rahman Allarakhia v. Bombay and Persia Steam Navigation Co. 1892 (Case Summary)\">Haji Abdul Rahman Allarakhia v. Bombay and Persia Steam Navigation<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case concerns a contractual dispute where the Plaintiff sought rectification based on a mistaken belief about the sailing date's...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/haji-abdul-rahman-allarakhia-v-bombay-and-persia-steam-navigation-co-1892-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5425 category-contract-law tags-acceptance-counter-offer-offer\" data-id=\"5425\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/brogden-v-metropolitan-railway-company-1877-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-20-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5426\" alt=\"Brogden v. Metropolitan Railway Company (1877)\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-20-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-20-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-20-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-20-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-20-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-20.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/brogden-v-metropolitan-railway-company-1877-case-summary\/\" title=\"Brogden v. Metropolitan Railway Company 1877 (Case Summary)\">Brogden v. Metropolitan Railway Company 1877 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case involves a long-standing commercial arrangement where parties sought to formalize their dealings through a written contract. Despite no...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/brogden-v-metropolitan-railway-company-1877-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5420 category-contract-law tags-acceptance-invitation-to-offer-offer\" data-id=\"5420\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/pharmaceutical-society-of-great-britain-v-boots-cash-chemists-ltd-1953-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-formal-slightly-vintage-style-legal-il_SWwRbLqQSpalQVn9CGbr_A_4FWWSRJdSkaa5L-scu0b_Q.jpeg-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5421\" alt=\"Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists Ltd. 1953\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-formal-slightly-vintage-style-legal-il_SWwRbLqQSpalQVn9CGbr_A_4FWWSRJdSkaa5L-scu0b_Q.jpeg-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-formal-slightly-vintage-style-legal-il_SWwRbLqQSpalQVn9CGbr_A_4FWWSRJdSkaa5L-scu0b_Q.jpeg-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-formal-slightly-vintage-style-legal-il_SWwRbLqQSpalQVn9CGbr_A_4FWWSRJdSkaa5L-scu0b_Q.jpeg-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-formal-slightly-vintage-style-legal-il_SWwRbLqQSpalQVn9CGbr_A_4FWWSRJdSkaa5L-scu0b_Q.jpeg-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-formal-slightly-vintage-style-legal-il_SWwRbLqQSpalQVn9CGbr_A_4FWWSRJdSkaa5L-scu0b_Q.jpeg.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/pharmaceutical-society-of-great-britain-v-boots-cash-chemists-ltd-1953-case-summary\/\" title=\"Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists Ltd. 1953 (Case Summary)\">Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists Ltd.<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case clarified and established an important principle in contract law regarding the difference between an \u201cinvitation to offer\u201d and...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/pharmaceutical-society-of-great-britain-v-boots-cash-chemists-ltd-1953-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5404 category-contract-law tags-acceptance-invitation-to-offer-offer\" data-id=\"5404\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/harvey-v-facey-1893-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-14-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5405\" alt=\"Harvey v. Facey\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-14-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-14-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-14-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-14-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-14-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-14.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/harvey-v-facey-1893-case-summary\/\" title=\"Harvey v. Facey 1893 (Case Summary)\">Harvey v. Facey 1893 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case laid the foundation for distinguishing between a mere supply of information and a binding offer in contract law....<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/harvey-v-facey-1893-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5393 category-contract-law tags-agreement-contractual-obligation\" data-id=\"5393\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/merritt-v-merritt\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-13-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5394\" alt=\"Merritt v. Merritt\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-13-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-13-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-13-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-13-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-13-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-13.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/merritt-v-merritt\/\" title=\"Merritt v. Merritt 1970 (Case Summary)\">Merritt v. Merritt 1970 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark decision by the Court of Appeal clarified the enforceability of agreements between estranged spouses. The court distinguished this...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/merritt-v-merritt\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5386 category-contract-law tags-acceptance-communication-postal-communication-telephonic-communication\" data-id=\"5386\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/bhagwandas-goverdhandas-kedia-v-m-s-girdharilal-parshottamdas-co-1965-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-10-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5387\" alt=\"Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. M\/s Girdharilal Parshottamdas &amp; Co.\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-10-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-10-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-10-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-10-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-10-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-10.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/bhagwandas-goverdhandas-kedia-v-m-s-girdharilal-parshottamdas-co-1965-case-summary\/\" title=\"Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. M\/s Girdharilal Parshottamdas &amp; Co. 1965 (Case Summary)\">Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. M\/s Girdharilal Parshottamdas &amp; Co. 1965<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark judgment by the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court of India clarified the legal principles governing contract formation via instantaneous communication...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/bhagwandas-goverdhandas-kedia-v-m-s-girdharilal-parshottamdas-co-1965-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5374 category-contract-law tags-consideration\" data-id=\"5374\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/durga-prasad-v-baldeo-1880-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-9-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5382\" alt=\"Durga Prasad v. Baldeo 1880\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-9-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-9-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-9-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-9-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-9-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-9.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/durga-prasad-v-baldeo-1880-case-summary\/\" title=\"Durga Prasad v. Baldeo 1880 (Case Summary)\">Durga Prasad v. Baldeo 1880 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case established the principle that in restitution claims, a plaintiff can recover only for services rendered for the benefit...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/durga-prasad-v-baldeo-1880-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5239 category-contract-law tags-agreement-in-restraint-of-trade-calcutta-high-court-section-27-of-ica\" data-id=\"5239\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/madhub-chander-v-raj-coomar-dass-1874-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-serene-and-warm-courtroom-setting-bath_dt8vf0IuRkqO4aK6puJ8lQ_zlSFSh5HTYKgkHvvn6h_zA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5240\" alt=\"Madhub Chander v. Raj Coomar Dass 1874\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-serene-and-warm-courtroom-setting-bath_dt8vf0IuRkqO4aK6puJ8lQ_zlSFSh5HTYKgkHvvn6h_zA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-serene-and-warm-courtroom-setting-bath_dt8vf0IuRkqO4aK6puJ8lQ_zlSFSh5HTYKgkHvvn6h_zA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-serene-and-warm-courtroom-setting-bath_dt8vf0IuRkqO4aK6puJ8lQ_zlSFSh5HTYKgkHvvn6h_zA-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-serene-and-warm-courtroom-setting-bath_dt8vf0IuRkqO4aK6puJ8lQ_zlSFSh5HTYKgkHvvn6h_zA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-serene-and-warm-courtroom-setting-bath_dt8vf0IuRkqO4aK6puJ8lQ_zlSFSh5HTYKgkHvvn6h_zA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/madhub-chander-v-raj-coomar-dass-1874-case-summary\/\" title=\"Madhub Chander v. Raj Coomar Dass 1874 (Case Summary)\">Madhub Chander v. Raj Coomar Dass 1874 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case the Hon\u2019ble Calcutta High Court addressed the enforceability of agreements that restrain trade under Section 27, Indian...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/madhub-chander-v-raj-coomar-dass-1874-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5189 category-contract-law tags-agreement-section-27-of-ica\" data-id=\"5189\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/pothi-ram-v-islam-fatima-1915-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-photograph-captures-a-tr_P1lZ_evLRP6Ul_smFruU_Q_xKkgdxaCSyys_hpaSKhptg-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5191\" alt=\"Pothi Ram v. Islam Fatima 1915\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-photograph-captures-a-tr_P1lZ_evLRP6Ul_smFruU_Q_xKkgdxaCSyys_hpaSKhptg-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-photograph-captures-a-tr_P1lZ_evLRP6Ul_smFruU_Q_xKkgdxaCSyys_hpaSKhptg-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-photograph-captures-a-tr_P1lZ_evLRP6Ul_smFruU_Q_xKkgdxaCSyys_hpaSKhptg-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-photograph-captures-a-tr_P1lZ_evLRP6Ul_smFruU_Q_xKkgdxaCSyys_hpaSKhptg-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-photograph-captures-a-tr_P1lZ_evLRP6Ul_smFruU_Q_xKkgdxaCSyys_hpaSKhptg.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/pothi-ram-v-islam-fatima-1915-case-summary\/\" title=\"Pothi Ram v. Islam Fatima 1915 (Case Summary)\">Pothi Ram v. Islam Fatima 1915 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case, the Hon\u2019ble Allahabad High Court examined the applicability of Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872,...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/pothi-ram-v-islam-fatima-1915-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5179 category-contract-law tags-section-23-of-ica-section-30-of-ica-supreme-court\" data-id=\"5179\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/gherulal-v-mahadev-1953-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-office-setting-with-rich_Q8AkV37EQE-ObZiWARW6ug_a6-7jbM3R1SjrjZlva29ZQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5182\" alt=\"Gherulal v. Mahadev 1953\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-office-setting-with-rich_Q8AkV37EQE-ObZiWARW6ug_a6-7jbM3R1SjrjZlva29ZQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-office-setting-with-rich_Q8AkV37EQE-ObZiWARW6ug_a6-7jbM3R1SjrjZlva29ZQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-office-setting-with-rich_Q8AkV37EQE-ObZiWARW6ug_a6-7jbM3R1SjrjZlva29ZQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-office-setting-with-rich_Q8AkV37EQE-ObZiWARW6ug_a6-7jbM3R1SjrjZlva29ZQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-warm-inviting-office-setting-with-rich_Q8AkV37EQE-ObZiWARW6ug_a6-7jbM3R1SjrjZlva29ZQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/gherulal-v-mahadev-1953-case-summary\/\" title=\"Gherulal v. Mahadev 1953\u00a0(Case Summary)\">Gherulal v. Mahadev 1953\u00a0(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India clarified the distinction between contracts that are void and those that...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/gherulal-v-mahadev-1953-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5169 category-contract-law tags-agreement-agreement-in-restraint-of-trade\" data-id=\"5169\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/bombay-ice-co-v-s-b-frazer-co-1904-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-generated-image-for-the-case-summary-w__d73zpU5RMO2fTsaf6T48w_Z-PI0aBJQt27PleEvkVLzQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5171\" alt=\"Bombay Ice Co. v. S. B. Frazer Co 1904\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-generated-image-for-the-case-summary-w__d73zpU5RMO2fTsaf6T48w_Z-PI0aBJQt27PleEvkVLzQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-generated-image-for-the-case-summary-w__d73zpU5RMO2fTsaf6T48w_Z-PI0aBJQt27PleEvkVLzQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-generated-image-for-the-case-summary-w__d73zpU5RMO2fTsaf6T48w_Z-PI0aBJQt27PleEvkVLzQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-generated-image-for-the-case-summary-w__d73zpU5RMO2fTsaf6T48w_Z-PI0aBJQt27PleEvkVLzQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-generated-image-for-the-case-summary-w__d73zpU5RMO2fTsaf6T48w_Z-PI0aBJQt27PleEvkVLzQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/bombay-ice-co-v-s-b-frazer-co-1904-case-summary\/\" title=\"Bombay Ice Co. v. S. B. Frazer Co 1904 (Case Summary)\">Bombay Ice Co. v. S. B. Frazer Co 1904 (Case<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case,the Hon\u2019ble Bombay High Court examined the validity of agreements among competitors concerning trade practices and their compliance...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/bombay-ice-co-v-s-b-frazer-co-1904-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4714 category-contract-law tags-doctrine-of-frustration-of-contracts\" data-id=\"4714\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/krell-v-henry-1903-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-courtroom-where-the-krell_jnODXf38RGKMJf1mXx7oBQ_iJKgyoS7RIS5NP-MyoAlpg-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4716\" alt=\"Krell v. Henry 1903\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-courtroom-where-the-krell_jnODXf38RGKMJf1mXx7oBQ_iJKgyoS7RIS5NP-MyoAlpg-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-courtroom-where-the-krell_jnODXf38RGKMJf1mXx7oBQ_iJKgyoS7RIS5NP-MyoAlpg-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-courtroom-where-the-krell_jnODXf38RGKMJf1mXx7oBQ_iJKgyoS7RIS5NP-MyoAlpg-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-courtroom-where-the-krell_jnODXf38RGKMJf1mXx7oBQ_iJKgyoS7RIS5NP-MyoAlpg-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-courtroom-where-the-krell_jnODXf38RGKMJf1mXx7oBQ_iJKgyoS7RIS5NP-MyoAlpg.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/krell-v-henry-1903-case-summary\/\" title=\"Krell v. Henry 1903 (Case Summary)\">Krell v. Henry 1903 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case, the Court of Appeal addressed the doctrine of frustration of contract. The case established that a contract...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/krell-v-henry-1903-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4707 category-contract-law tags-employment-contracts-injunction\" data-id=\"4707\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/warner-bros-v-nelson-1937-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitt_hBYLUkDSTEC3Z8HAvb55TQ_VyqBi8tsTC2EwCVEYnbuiw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4709\" alt=\"Warner Bros v. Nelson 1937\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitt_hBYLUkDSTEC3Z8HAvb55TQ_VyqBi8tsTC2EwCVEYnbuiw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitt_hBYLUkDSTEC3Z8HAvb55TQ_VyqBi8tsTC2EwCVEYnbuiw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitt_hBYLUkDSTEC3Z8HAvb55TQ_VyqBi8tsTC2EwCVEYnbuiw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitt_hBYLUkDSTEC3Z8HAvb55TQ_VyqBi8tsTC2EwCVEYnbuiw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-sitt_hBYLUkDSTEC3Z8HAvb55TQ_VyqBi8tsTC2EwCVEYnbuiw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/warner-bros-v-nelson-1937-case-summary\/\" title=\"Warner Bros v. Nelson 1937 (Case Summary)\">Warner Bros v. Nelson 1937 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case, the court addressed the enforceability of negative covenants in employment contracts. The case involved a dispute over...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/warner-bros-v-nelson-1937-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4700 category-contract-law tags-breach-of-promise-to-marry-contractual-obligation\" data-id=\"4700\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/jefferson-v-paskell-1916-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-on-the-_lekP8HjpQlaQ7X5ax3UhaQ_HgU1KoF_SBm8MklBHuEi7w-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4702\" alt=\"Jefferson v. Paskell 1916\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-on-the-_lekP8HjpQlaQ7X5ax3UhaQ_HgU1KoF_SBm8MklBHuEi7w-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-on-the-_lekP8HjpQlaQ7X5ax3UhaQ_HgU1KoF_SBm8MklBHuEi7w-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-on-the-_lekP8HjpQlaQ7X5ax3UhaQ_HgU1KoF_SBm8MklBHuEi7w-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-on-the-_lekP8HjpQlaQ7X5ax3UhaQ_HgU1KoF_SBm8MklBHuEi7w-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-on-the-_lekP8HjpQlaQ7X5ax3UhaQ_HgU1KoF_SBm8MklBHuEi7w.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/jefferson-v-paskell-1916-case-summary\/\" title=\"Jefferson v. Paskell 1916 (Case Summary)\">Jefferson v. Paskell 1916 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this case, the court addressed a breach of promise to marry, focusing on the readiness and fitness of the...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/jefferson-v-paskell-1916-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4674 category-contract-law tags-consideration-privity-of-contract\" data-id=\"4674\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/tweddle-v-atkinson-1861-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-historical-illustration-of-the-court-r_jAg1lr-5TfWdp0CIiALJzg_9tec2OHkQ1ykLmImOVe3lg-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4676\" alt=\"Tweddle v. Atkinson 1861\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-historical-illustration-of-the-court-r_jAg1lr-5TfWdp0CIiALJzg_9tec2OHkQ1ykLmImOVe3lg-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-historical-illustration-of-the-court-r_jAg1lr-5TfWdp0CIiALJzg_9tec2OHkQ1ykLmImOVe3lg-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-historical-illustration-of-the-court-r_jAg1lr-5TfWdp0CIiALJzg_9tec2OHkQ1ykLmImOVe3lg-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-historical-illustration-of-the-court-r_jAg1lr-5TfWdp0CIiALJzg_9tec2OHkQ1ykLmImOVe3lg-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-historical-illustration-of-the-court-r_jAg1lr-5TfWdp0CIiALJzg_9tec2OHkQ1ykLmImOVe3lg.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/tweddle-v-atkinson-1861-case-summary\/\" title=\"Tweddle v. Atkinson 1861 (Case Summary)\">Tweddle v. Atkinson 1861 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case established the foundational principle of privity of contract in English law, holding that only parties to a contract...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/tweddle-v-atkinson-1861-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4607 category-contract-law tags-acceptance-communication-offer\" data-id=\"4607\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/carlill-v-carbolic-smoke-ball-company-1893-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-a-pl_vklWxsv4SMyGTysgDwy50g_l4W3APGkQoqDmp4KmsfFoQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4612\" alt=\"Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company 1893\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-a-pl_vklWxsv4SMyGTysgDwy50g_l4W3APGkQoqDmp4KmsfFoQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-a-pl_vklWxsv4SMyGTysgDwy50g_l4W3APGkQoqDmp4KmsfFoQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-a-pl_vklWxsv4SMyGTysgDwy50g_l4W3APGkQoqDmp4KmsfFoQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-a-pl_vklWxsv4SMyGTysgDwy50g_l4W3APGkQoqDmp4KmsfFoQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-a-pl_vklWxsv4SMyGTysgDwy50g_l4W3APGkQoqDmp4KmsfFoQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/carlill-v-carbolic-smoke-ball-company-1893-case-summary\/\" title=\"Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company 1893 (Case Summary)\">Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company 1893 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company is one of the most famous cases in contract law establishing principles regarding unilateral...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/carlill-v-carbolic-smoke-ball-company-1893-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4599 category-contract-law tags-acceptance-offer\" data-id=\"4599\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/felthouse-v-bindley-1862-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-p_CfijeWxmTvavaJsZjZjczA_AGulgjZoTH-YXF04Ba88pg-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4601\" alt=\"FeltHouse v. Bindley 1862\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-p_CfijeWxmTvavaJsZjZjczA_AGulgjZoTH-YXF04Ba88pg-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-p_CfijeWxmTvavaJsZjZjczA_AGulgjZoTH-YXF04Ba88pg-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-p_CfijeWxmTvavaJsZjZjczA_AGulgjZoTH-YXF04Ba88pg-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-p_CfijeWxmTvavaJsZjZjczA_AGulgjZoTH-YXF04Ba88pg-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-p_CfijeWxmTvavaJsZjZjczA_AGulgjZoTH-YXF04Ba88pg.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/felthouse-v-bindley-1862-case-summary\/\" title=\"FeltHouse v. Bindley 1862 (Case Summary)\">FeltHouse v. Bindley 1862 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>A landmark case in contract law, Felthouse v. Bindley, established the rule that an offer cannot be accepted by silence....<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/felthouse-v-bindley-1862-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4584 category-contract-law tags-consideration\" data-id=\"4584\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/chappell-and-co-v-nestle-co-ltd-1960-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-two-_Nc4N8YcqS9Sj0uVhyyethQ_MAAiMGfhQ6mUZEnl_mbuHw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4586\" alt=\"Chappell and Co. v. Nestle Co. Ltd 1960\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-two-_Nc4N8YcqS9Sj0uVhyyethQ_MAAiMGfhQ6mUZEnl_mbuHw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-two-_Nc4N8YcqS9Sj0uVhyyethQ_MAAiMGfhQ6mUZEnl_mbuHw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-two-_Nc4N8YcqS9Sj0uVhyyethQ_MAAiMGfhQ6mUZEnl_mbuHw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-two-_Nc4N8YcqS9Sj0uVhyyethQ_MAAiMGfhQ6mUZEnl_mbuHw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-a-judge-two-_Nc4N8YcqS9Sj0uVhyyethQ_MAAiMGfhQ6mUZEnl_mbuHw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/chappell-and-co-v-nestle-co-ltd-1960-case-summary\/\" title=\"Chappell and Co. v. Nestle Co. Ltd 1960 (Case Summary)\">Chappell and Co. v. Nestle Co. Ltd 1960 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case is a landmark decision in contract law that clarified the definition of consideration, affirming that even items of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/chappell-and-co-v-nestle-co-ltd-1960-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4576 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4576\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/clarke-v-dunraven-1897-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-illustration-of-a-courtroom-with-a-ju_c0qNbu4rSVGK3vs27NihSQ_nm_zJ7_4S6-h7X5jQWZCHQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4578\" alt=\"Clarke v. Dunraven 1897\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-illustration-of-a-courtroom-with-a-ju_c0qNbu4rSVGK3vs27NihSQ_nm_zJ7_4S6-h7X5jQWZCHQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-illustration-of-a-courtroom-with-a-ju_c0qNbu4rSVGK3vs27NihSQ_nm_zJ7_4S6-h7X5jQWZCHQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-illustration-of-a-courtroom-with-a-ju_c0qNbu4rSVGK3vs27NihSQ_nm_zJ7_4S6-h7X5jQWZCHQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-illustration-of-a-courtroom-with-a-ju_c0qNbu4rSVGK3vs27NihSQ_nm_zJ7_4S6-h7X5jQWZCHQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/an-illustration-of-a-courtroom-with-a-ju_c0qNbu4rSVGK3vs27NihSQ_nm_zJ7_4S6-h7X5jQWZCHQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/clarke-v-dunraven-1897-case-summary\/\" title=\"Clarke v. Dunraven 1897 (Case Summary)\">Clarke v. Dunraven 1897 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case established that mutual consent to adhere to a set of rules can create binding contractual obligations between parties,...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/clarke-v-dunraven-1897-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4569 category-contract-law tags-acceptance-communication-offer\" data-id=\"4569\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/hindustan-co-op-insurance-society-v-shyam-sunder-1952case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-wooden-bench_nRsDs6qBQPuX5vZ06syFTg_6fTIilw_T2O4B3wveupGHg-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4571\" alt=\"Hindustan Co Op Insurance Society v. Shyam Sunder 1952\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-wooden-bench_nRsDs6qBQPuX5vZ06syFTg_6fTIilw_T2O4B3wveupGHg-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-wooden-bench_nRsDs6qBQPuX5vZ06syFTg_6fTIilw_T2O4B3wveupGHg-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-wooden-bench_nRsDs6qBQPuX5vZ06syFTg_6fTIilw_T2O4B3wveupGHg-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-wooden-bench_nRsDs6qBQPuX5vZ06syFTg_6fTIilw_T2O4B3wveupGHg-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-courtroom-with-wooden-bench_nRsDs6qBQPuX5vZ06syFTg_6fTIilw_T2O4B3wveupGHg.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/hindustan-co-op-insurance-society-v-shyam-sunder-1952case-summary\/\" title=\"Hindustan Co Op Insurance Society v. Shyam Sunder 1952(Case Summary)\">Hindustan Co Op Insurance Society v. Shyam Sunder 1952(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case is a landmark decision, the Calcutta High Court deliberated on whether the acceptance of a life insurance proposal...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/hindustan-co-op-insurance-society-v-shyam-sunder-1952case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4562 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4562\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/jones-v-padavatton-1969case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-english-court-of-appeal-b_eVmL0cdQQHuYaqN41tA2Qg_qrwa_SWkRYOfIKw8iqYB2A-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4564\" alt=\"Jones v. Padavatton 1969\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-english-court-of-appeal-b_eVmL0cdQQHuYaqN41tA2Qg_qrwa_SWkRYOfIKw8iqYB2A-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-english-court-of-appeal-b_eVmL0cdQQHuYaqN41tA2Qg_qrwa_SWkRYOfIKw8iqYB2A-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-english-court-of-appeal-b_eVmL0cdQQHuYaqN41tA2Qg_qrwa_SWkRYOfIKw8iqYB2A-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-english-court-of-appeal-b_eVmL0cdQQHuYaqN41tA2Qg_qrwa_SWkRYOfIKw8iqYB2A-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-english-court-of-appeal-b_eVmL0cdQQHuYaqN41tA2Qg_qrwa_SWkRYOfIKw8iqYB2A.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/jones-v-padavatton-1969case-summary\/\" title=\"Jones v. Padavatton 1969(Case Summary)\">Jones v. Padavatton 1969(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In Jones v. Padavatton, the English Court of Appeal examined the enforceability of family arrangements and clarified the importance of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/jones-v-padavatton-1969case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4555 category-contract-law tags-partnership\" data-id=\"4555\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/cox-v-hickman-1860case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TAoEiJmxTbeIi0xVlWT9qQ_p3amKyawROOfucs2n0ba4A-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4557\" alt=\"Cox v. Hickman 1860\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TAoEiJmxTbeIi0xVlWT9qQ_p3amKyawROOfucs2n0ba4A-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TAoEiJmxTbeIi0xVlWT9qQ_p3amKyawROOfucs2n0ba4A-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TAoEiJmxTbeIi0xVlWT9qQ_p3amKyawROOfucs2n0ba4A-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TAoEiJmxTbeIi0xVlWT9qQ_p3amKyawROOfucs2n0ba4A-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TAoEiJmxTbeIi0xVlWT9qQ_p3amKyawROOfucs2n0ba4A.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/cox-v-hickman-1860case-summary\/\" title=\"Cox v. Hickman 1860(Case Summary)\">Cox v. Hickman 1860(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In the landmark case of Cox v. Hickman, the House of Lords established the critical principle that sharing profits alone...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/cox-v-hickman-1860case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4547 category-contract-law tags-principle-of-necessity-of-agency\" data-id=\"4547\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/great-northern-railway-v-swaffield-1874-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-l_PjJsSdgRQ_SqrAGtXxztjw_xHRiJUnVTNSQ93WUTdyxTA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4549\" alt=\"Great Northern Railway v. Swaffield 1874\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-l_PjJsSdgRQ_SqrAGtXxztjw_xHRiJUnVTNSQ93WUTdyxTA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-l_PjJsSdgRQ_SqrAGtXxztjw_xHRiJUnVTNSQ93WUTdyxTA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-l_PjJsSdgRQ_SqrAGtXxztjw_xHRiJUnVTNSQ93WUTdyxTA-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-l_PjJsSdgRQ_SqrAGtXxztjw_xHRiJUnVTNSQ93WUTdyxTA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-court-room-with-a-judge-a-l_PjJsSdgRQ_SqrAGtXxztjw_xHRiJUnVTNSQ93WUTdyxTA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/great-northern-railway-v-swaffield-1874-case-summary\/\" title=\"Great Northern Railway v. Swaffield 1874 (Case Summary)\">Great Northern Railway v. Swaffield 1874 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case established the principle of necessity of agency in English law, where a party can act on behalf of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/great-northern-railway-v-swaffield-1874-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4540 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4540\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/taylor-v-caldwell-1863-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TV8Hmk6vRB-tXqpVRPXCUQ_yyx5cmh3Tc6gkUlnR_DXCQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4542\" alt=\"Taylor v. Caldwell 1863\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TV8Hmk6vRB-tXqpVRPXCUQ_yyx5cmh3Tc6gkUlnR_DXCQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TV8Hmk6vRB-tXqpVRPXCUQ_yyx5cmh3Tc6gkUlnR_DXCQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TV8Hmk6vRB-tXqpVRPXCUQ_yyx5cmh3Tc6gkUlnR_DXCQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TV8Hmk6vRB-tXqpVRPXCUQ_yyx5cmh3Tc6gkUlnR_DXCQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-vintage-illustration-of-a-courtroom-se_TV8Hmk6vRB-tXqpVRPXCUQ_yyx5cmh3Tc6gkUlnR_DXCQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/taylor-v-caldwell-1863-case-summary\/\" title=\"Taylor v. Caldwell 1863 (Case Summary)\">Taylor v. Caldwell 1863 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark decision by the Court of Queen\u2019s Bench established the doctrine of frustration in contract law, holding that a...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/taylor-v-caldwell-1863-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4533 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4533\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/khwaja-muhammad-khan-v-hussaini-begum-1910-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-photo-of-the-privy-cou_w2bko4b1RninlrPhW2lgWg_fBK5_hm4SMuvskR4eQnDeg-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4535\" alt=\"Khwaja Muhammad Khan v. Hussaini Begum 1910\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-photo-of-the-privy-cou_w2bko4b1RninlrPhW2lgWg_fBK5_hm4SMuvskR4eQnDeg-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-photo-of-the-privy-cou_w2bko4b1RninlrPhW2lgWg_fBK5_hm4SMuvskR4eQnDeg-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-photo-of-the-privy-cou_w2bko4b1RninlrPhW2lgWg_fBK5_hm4SMuvskR4eQnDeg-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-photo-of-the-privy-cou_w2bko4b1RninlrPhW2lgWg_fBK5_hm4SMuvskR4eQnDeg-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-black-and-white-photo-of-the-privy-cou_w2bko4b1RninlrPhW2lgWg_fBK5_hm4SMuvskR4eQnDeg.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/khwaja-muhammad-khan-v-hussaini-begum-1910-case-summary\/\" title=\"Khwaja Muhammad Khan v. Hussaini Begum 1910 (Case Summary)\">Khwaja Muhammad Khan v. Hussaini Begum 1910 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this historic case, the Privy Council dealt with the enforceability of a contract made by a father-in-law to provide...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/khwaja-muhammad-khan-v-hussaini-begum-1910-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4129 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4129\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/c-k-asati-v-union-of-india-2005-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-madhya-pradesh-high-court_F-VJ2lwBQT6WKqgLsfpAjw_XyXj6CyHQWa8KmLzNfu5Hw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4131\" alt=\"C.K. Asati v. Union of India 2005\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-madhya-pradesh-high-court_F-VJ2lwBQT6WKqgLsfpAjw_XyXj6CyHQWa8KmLzNfu5Hw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-madhya-pradesh-high-court_F-VJ2lwBQT6WKqgLsfpAjw_XyXj6CyHQWa8KmLzNfu5Hw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-madhya-pradesh-high-court_F-VJ2lwBQT6WKqgLsfpAjw_XyXj6CyHQWa8KmLzNfu5Hw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-madhya-pradesh-high-court_F-VJ2lwBQT6WKqgLsfpAjw_XyXj6CyHQWa8KmLzNfu5Hw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-the-madhya-pradesh-high-court_F-VJ2lwBQT6WKqgLsfpAjw_XyXj6CyHQWa8KmLzNfu5Hw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/c-k-asati-v-union-of-india-2005-case-summary\/\" title=\"C.K. Asati v. Union of India 2005 (Case Summary)\">C.K. Asati v. Union of India 2005 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>In this significant decision, the Madhya Pradesh High Court addressed whether the experience of a proprietor could be attributed to...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/c-k-asati-v-union-of-india-2005-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4122 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4122\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/burnard-v-haggis-1863-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/burnard-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4124\" alt=\"Burnard v. Haggis 1863\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/burnard-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/burnard-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/burnard-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/burnard-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/burnard.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/burnard-v-haggis-1863-case-summary\/\" title=\"Burnard v. Haggis 1863 (Case Summary)\">Burnard v. Haggis 1863 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case is a significant English legal precedent concerning the liability of minors in tort. This case established that while...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/burnard-v-haggis-1863-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4115 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4115\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/mohori-bibee-v-dharmodas-ghosh-1903-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Mohori-Bibee-v.-Dharmodas-Ghosh-1903-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4117\" alt=\"Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghosh 1903\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Mohori-Bibee-v.-Dharmodas-Ghosh-1903-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Mohori-Bibee-v.-Dharmodas-Ghosh-1903-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Mohori-Bibee-v.-Dharmodas-Ghosh-1903-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Mohori-Bibee-v.-Dharmodas-Ghosh-1903-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Mohori-Bibee-v.-Dharmodas-Ghosh-1903.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/mohori-bibee-v-dharmodas-ghosh-1903-case-summary\/\" title=\"Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghosh 1903 (Case Summary)\">Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghosh 1903 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark judgment by the Privy Council established the principle that a minor's contract is void ab initio under Indian...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/mohori-bibee-v-dharmodas-ghosh-1903-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4108 category-contract-law tags-misrepresentation\" data-id=\"4108\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/leslie-v-sheill-1914-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Leslie-v.-Sheill-1914-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4110\" alt=\"Leslie v. Sheill 1914\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Leslie-v.-Sheill-1914-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Leslie-v.-Sheill-1914-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Leslie-v.-Sheill-1914-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Leslie-v.-Sheill-1914-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Leslie-v.-Sheill-1914.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/leslie-v-sheill-1914-case-summary\/\" title=\"Leslie v. Sheill 1914 (Case Summary)\">Leslie v. Sheill 1914 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case established the principle that a minor cannot be held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation about their age to obtain...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/leslie-v-sheill-1914-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4101 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4101\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/powell-v-lee-1908-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Powell-v.-Lee-1908-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4103\" alt=\"Powell v. Lee 1908\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Powell-v.-Lee-1908-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Powell-v.-Lee-1908-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Powell-v.-Lee-1908-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Powell-v.-Lee-1908-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Powell-v.-Lee-1908.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/powell-v-lee-1908-case-summary\/\" title=\"Powell v. Lee 1908 (Case Summary)\">Powell v. Lee 1908 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case is an important decision in contract law that clarified the necessity of proper communication of acceptance to form...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/powell-v-lee-1908-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4094 category-contract-law tags-offer\" data-id=\"4094\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/lalman-shukla-v-gauri-dutta-1913-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-and-two_6rRgbFcUTMWpdzZauI-00g_0seX0dqORyuPc7K6PbtLow-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4096\" alt=\"Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutta 1913\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-and-two_6rRgbFcUTMWpdzZauI-00g_0seX0dqORyuPc7K6PbtLow-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-and-two_6rRgbFcUTMWpdzZauI-00g_0seX0dqORyuPc7K6PbtLow-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-and-two_6rRgbFcUTMWpdzZauI-00g_0seX0dqORyuPc7K6PbtLow-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-and-two_6rRgbFcUTMWpdzZauI-00g_0seX0dqORyuPc7K6PbtLow-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-courtroom-setting-with-a-judge-and-two_6rRgbFcUTMWpdzZauI-00g_0seX0dqORyuPc7K6PbtLow.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/lalman-shukla-v-gauri-dutta-1913-case-summary\/\" title=\"Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutta 1913 (Case Summary)\">Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutta 1913 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case is a landmark decision in Indian contract law, dealing with the essentials of a valid contract, particularly the...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/lalman-shukla-v-gauri-dutta-1913-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4087 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4087\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/balfour-v-balfour-1919-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-judge-s-gavel-the-text-balf_0HVJ3haFQFyQFsT2FfbE5g_TdkG1z0IQKm-M9-Lok-_Jw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4089\" alt=\"Balfour v. Balfour 1919\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-judge-s-gavel-the-text-balf_0HVJ3haFQFyQFsT2FfbE5g_TdkG1z0IQKm-M9-Lok-_Jw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-judge-s-gavel-the-text-balf_0HVJ3haFQFyQFsT2FfbE5g_TdkG1z0IQKm-M9-Lok-_Jw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-judge-s-gavel-the-text-balf_0HVJ3haFQFyQFsT2FfbE5g_TdkG1z0IQKm-M9-Lok-_Jw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-judge-s-gavel-the-text-balf_0HVJ3haFQFyQFsT2FfbE5g_TdkG1z0IQKm-M9-Lok-_Jw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-photo-of-a-judge-s-gavel-the-text-balf_0HVJ3haFQFyQFsT2FfbE5g_TdkG1z0IQKm-M9-Lok-_Jw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/balfour-v-balfour-1919-case-summary\/\" title=\"Balfour v. Balfour 1919 (Case Summary)\">Balfour v. Balfour 1919 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark case in contract law established the principle that domestic agreements between spouses are presumed not to have legal...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/balfour-v-balfour-1919-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-4078 category-contract-law\" data-id=\"4078\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/mcgregor-v-mcgregor-1888-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-illustration-with-the-text-mcgre_vNYTgB7GSbmStMe-Rvt63w_igDC4rsNTQ-iu9U3hEeHw-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-4081\" alt=\"McGregor v. McGregor 1888\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-illustration-with-the-text-mcgre_vNYTgB7GSbmStMe-Rvt63w_igDC4rsNTQ-iu9U3hEeHw-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-illustration-with-the-text-mcgre_vNYTgB7GSbmStMe-Rvt63w_igDC4rsNTQ-iu9U3hEeHw-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-illustration-with-the-text-mcgre_vNYTgB7GSbmStMe-Rvt63w_igDC4rsNTQ-iu9U3hEeHw-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-illustration-with-the-text-mcgre_vNYTgB7GSbmStMe-Rvt63w_igDC4rsNTQ-iu9U3hEeHw-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-illustration-with-the-text-mcgre_vNYTgB7GSbmStMe-Rvt63w_igDC4rsNTQ-iu9U3hEeHw.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/mcgregor-v-mcgregor-1888-case-summary\/\" title=\"McGregor v. McGregor 1888 (Case Summary)\">McGregor v. McGregor 1888 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case is a foundational decision in contract law that addressed the enforceability of agreements between spouses, particularly regarding domestic...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/contract-law\/mcgregor-v-mcgregor-1888-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><\/div>\n            <div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-4d56fd4 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"4d56fd4\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-ede94b4\" data-id=\"ede94b4\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8a4abbe elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-fancy-text\" data-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"eael-fancy-text.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t<div  class=\"eael-fancy-text-container style-1\" data-fancy-text-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-fancy-text=\"|     to come...\" data-fancy-text-transition-type=\"typing\" data-fancy-text-speed=\"50\" data-fancy-text-delay=\"2500\" data-fancy-text-cursor=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-loop=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-action=\"page_load\" >\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"eael-fancy-text-prefix\">And a lot more <\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<span id=\"eael-fancy-text-8a4abbe\" class=\"eael-fancy-text-strings solid-color\">\n\t\t\t\t<noscript>\n\t\t\t\t\t     to come...\t\t\t\t<\/noscript>\n\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div><!-- close .eael-fancy-text-container -->\n\n\t<div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Contracts Law Harvey v. Facey 1893 (Case Summary) This case laid the foundation for distinguishing between a mere supply of information and a binding offer in contract law&#8230;. Read More Merritt v. Merritt 1970 (Case Summary) This landmark decision by the Court of Appeal clarified the enforceability of agreements between estranged spouses. The court distinguished this&#8230; Read More Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. M\/s Girdharilal Parshottamdas &amp; Co. 1965 This landmark judgment by the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court of India clarified the legal principles governing contract formation via instantaneous communication&#8230; Read More Durga Prasad v. Baldeo 1880 (Case Summary) This case established the principle that in restitution claims, a plaintiff can recover only for services rendered for the benefit&#8230; Read More Madhub Chander v. Raj Coomar Dass 1874 (Case Summary) In this case the Hon\u2019ble Calcutta High Court addressed the enforceability of agreements that restrain trade under Section 27, Indian&#8230; Read More Pothi Ram v. Islam Fatima 1915 (Case Summary) In this case, the Hon\u2019ble Allahabad High Court examined the applicability of Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872,&#8230; Read More Gherulal v. Mahadev 1953\u00a0(Case Summary) In this landmark case, the Supreme Court of India clarified the distinction between contracts that are void and those that&#8230; Read More Bombay Ice Co. v. S. B. Frazer Co 1904 (Case In this case,the Hon\u2019ble Bombay High Court examined the validity of agreements among competitors concerning trade practices and their compliance&#8230; Read More Krell v. Henry 1903 (Case Summary) In this case, the Court of Appeal addressed the doctrine of frustration of contract. The case established that a contract&#8230; Read More Warner Bros v. Nelson 1937 (Case Summary) In this case, the court addressed the enforceability of negative covenants in employment contracts. The case involved a dispute over&#8230; Read More Jefferson v. Paskell 1916 (Case Summary) In this case, the court addressed a breach of promise to marry, focusing on the readiness and fitness of the&#8230; Read More Tweddle v. Atkinson 1861 (Case Summary) This case established the foundational principle of privity of contract in English law, holding that only parties to a contract&#8230; Read More Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company 1893 (Case Summary) Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company is one of the most famous cases in contract law establishing principles regarding unilateral&#8230; Read More FeltHouse v. Bindley 1862 (Case Summary) A landmark case in contract law, Felthouse v. Bindley, established the rule that an offer cannot be accepted by silence&#8230;. Read More Chappell and Co. v. Nestle Co. Ltd 1960 (Case Summary) This case is a landmark decision in contract law that clarified the definition of consideration, affirming that even items of&#8230; Read More Clarke v. Dunraven 1897 (Case Summary) This case established that mutual consent to adhere to a set of rules can create binding contractual obligations between parties,&#8230; Read More Hindustan Co Op Insurance Society v. Shyam Sunder 1952(Case Summary) This case is a landmark decision, the Calcutta High Court deliberated on whether the acceptance of a life insurance proposal&#8230; Read More Jones v. Padavatton 1969(Case Summary) In Jones v. Padavatton, the English Court of Appeal examined the enforceability of family arrangements and clarified the importance of&#8230; Read More Cox v. Hickman 1860(Case Summary) In the landmark case of Cox v. Hickman, the House of Lords established the critical principle that sharing profits alone&#8230; Read More Great Northern Railway v. Swaffield 1874 (Case Summary) This case established the principle of necessity of agency in English law, where a party can act on behalf of&#8230; Read More Taylor v. Caldwell 1863 (Case Summary) This landmark decision by the Court of Queen\u2019s Bench established the doctrine of frustration in contract law, holding that a&#8230; Read More Khwaja Muhammad Khan v. Hussaini Begum 1910 (Case Summary) In this historic case, the Privy Council dealt with the enforceability of a contract made by a father-in-law to provide&#8230; Read More C.K. Asati v. Union of India 2005 (Case Summary) In this significant decision, the Madhya Pradesh High Court addressed whether the experience of a proprietor could be attributed to&#8230; Read More Burnard v. Haggis 1863 (Case Summary) This case is a significant English legal precedent concerning the liability of minors in tort. This case established that while&#8230; Read More Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghosh 1903 (Case Summary) This landmark judgment by the Privy Council established the principle that a minor&#039;s contract is void ab initio under Indian&#8230; Read More Leslie v. Sheill 1914 (Case Summary) This case established the principle that a minor cannot be held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation about their age to obtain&#8230; Read More Powell v. Lee 1908 (Case Summary) This case is an important decision in contract law that clarified the necessity of proper communication of acceptance to form&#8230; Read More Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutta 1913 (Case Summary) This case is a landmark decision in Indian contract law, dealing with the essentials of a valid contract, particularly the&#8230; Read More Balfour v. Balfour 1919 (Case Summary) This landmark case in contract law established the principle that domestic agreements between spouses are presumed not to have legal&#8230; Read More McGregor v. McGregor 1888 (Case Summary) This case is a foundational decision in contract law that addressed the enforceability of agreements between spouses, particularly regarding domestic&#8230; Read More And a lot more to come&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"no-sidebar","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"full-width-container","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"disabled","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-4504","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4504"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4504\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5416,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/4504\/revisions\/5416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}