{"id":5015,"date":"2025-03-08T21:48:35","date_gmt":"2025-03-08T16:18:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/?page_id=5015"},"modified":"2025-03-09T13:29:02","modified_gmt":"2025-03-09T07:59:02","slug":"bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/","title":{"rendered":"Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-page\" data-elementor-id=\"5015\" class=\"elementor elementor-5015\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-ce37983 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"ce37983\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-525956c\" data-id=\"525956c\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d6987e9 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"d6987e9\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8118200 elementor-widget-divider--separator-type-pattern elementor-widget-divider--no-spacing elementor-widget-divider--view-line elementor-widget elementor-widget-divider\" data-id=\"8118200\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"divider.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-divider\" style=\"--divider-pattern-url: url(&quot;data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg xmlns=&#039;http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg&#039; preserveAspectRatio=&#039;none&#039; overflow=&#039;visible&#039; height=&#039;100%&#039; viewBox=&#039;0 0 24 24&#039; fill=&#039;black&#039; stroke=&#039;none&#039;%3E%3Cpath d=&#039;M24,8v12H0V8H24z M24,4v1H0V4H24z&#039;\/%3E%3C\/svg%3E&quot;);\">\n\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-divider-separator\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0aebdab elementor-widget__width-inherit elementor-grid-eael-col-4 elementor-grid-tablet-eael-col-2 elementor-grid-mobile-eael-col-1 elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-post-grid\" data-id=\"0aebdab\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-settings=\"{&quot;eael_post_grid_columns&quot;:&quot;eael-col-4&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_tablet&quot;:&quot;eael-col-2&quot;,&quot;eael_post_grid_columns_mobile&quot;:&quot;eael-col-1&quot;}\" data-widget_type=\"eael-post-grid.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div id=\"eael-post-grid-0aebdab\" class=\"eael-post-grid-container\">\n            <div class=\"eael-post-grid eael-post-appender eael-post-appender-0aebdab eael-post-grid-style-one\" data-layout-mode=\"masonry\"><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6123 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-criminal-trial-supreme-court\" data-id=\"6123\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-gujarat-v-mohanlal-jitamalji-porwal-1987case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-82-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6135\" alt=\"State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-82-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-82-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-82-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-82-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-82-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-82.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-gujarat-v-mohanlal-jitamalji-porwal-1987case-summary\/\" title=\"State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal 1987(Case Summary)\">State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal 1987(Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 ez-toc-wrap-left counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-ors-2013-case-summary\/#Facts_of_Lalita_Kumari_v_Govt_of_UP\" >Facts of Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P.\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-ors-2013-case-summary\/#Issues_framed\" >Issues framed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-ors-2013-case-summary\/#Judgment_of_Lalita_Kumari_v_Govt_of_UP\" >Judgment of Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P.<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-ors-2013-case-summary\/#Read_the_Judgment_Below\" >Read the Judgment Below<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case is a powerful reminder that victims and the society at large have a stake in the outcome of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-gujarat-v-mohanlal-jitamalji-porwal-1987case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6116 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-chapter-xxia-of-crpc\" data-id=\"6116\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/union-of-india-v-t-nathamuni-2020-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-80-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6118\" alt=\"Union of India v. T. Nathamuni\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-80-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-80-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-80-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-80-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-80-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-80.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/union-of-india-v-t-nathamuni-2020-case-summary\/\" title=\"Union of India v. T. Nathamuni 2020 (Case Summary)\">Union of India v. T. Nathamuni 2020 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case deals with the process of plea bargaining under the CrPC and explains how courts should ensure that such...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/union-of-india-v-t-nathamuni-2020-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6094 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-210-bnss-charge-sheet-section-1732-crpc-section-1738-crpc\" data-id=\"6094\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6096\" alt=\"Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/\" title=\"Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali 2013 (Case Summary)\">Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali 2013 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case explained what courts can do when they receive a supplementary or further investigation report that is different from...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6086 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-fir-section-1563-crpc-section-482-crpc\" data-id=\"6086\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/sakiri-vasu-v-state-of-uttar-pradesh-2008-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-75-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6088\" alt=\"Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-75-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-75-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-75-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-75-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-75-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-75.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/sakiri-vasu-v-state-of-uttar-pradesh-2008-case-summary\/\" title=\"Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh 2008 (Case Summary)\">Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh 2008 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case clarified what a person should do if the police refuse to register their FIR. The Supreme Court explained...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/sakiri-vasu-v-state-of-uttar-pradesh-2008-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6076 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-arrest-police-custody-section-167-crpc-section-1672-crpc-supreme-court\" data-id=\"6076\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/cbi-v-anupam-j-kulkarni-1992-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-73-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6078\" alt=\"CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-73-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-73-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-73-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-73-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-73-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-73.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/cbi-v-anupam-j-kulkarni-1992-case-summary\/\" title=\"CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni 1992 (Case Summary)\">CBI v. Anupam J. Kulkarni 1992 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case clarified the rules about how long a person can be kept in police custody after arrest. The Supreme...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/cbi-v-anupam-j-kulkarni-1992-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6067 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-427-ipc-inquiry-section-319-crpc\" data-id=\"6067\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/hardeep-singh-v-state-of-punjab-2014-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-72-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6069\" alt=\"Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-72-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-72-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-72-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-72-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-72-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-72.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/hardeep-singh-v-state-of-punjab-2014-case-summary\/\" title=\"Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab 2014 (Case Summary)\">Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab 2014 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case clarified the scope of a magistrate or court's power to summon additional accused during the trial, even if...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/hardeep-singh-v-state-of-punjab-2014-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6058 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-fir-section-482-crpc-supreme-court\" data-id=\"6058\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-haryana-v-bhajan-lal\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-71-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6059\" alt=\"State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-71-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-71-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-71-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-71-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-71-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-71.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-haryana-v-bhajan-lal\/\" title=\"State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal 1992 (Case Summary)\">State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal 1992 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case is the most cited authority for quashing an FIR under Section 482 CrPC. The Supreme Court laid down...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-haryana-v-bhajan-lal\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6049 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-section-106-indian-evidence-act-supreme-court\" data-id=\"6049\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-rajasthan-v-kashi-ram-2006-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-70-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6053\" alt=\"State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-70-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-70-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-70-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-70-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-70-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-70.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-rajasthan-v-kashi-ram-2006-case-summary\/\" title=\"State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram 2006 (Case Summary)\">State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram 2006 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case clarified the evidentiary value of circumstantial evidence and the use of Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act,...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-rajasthan-v-kashi-ram-2006-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6040 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-criminal-trials-fir\" data-id=\"6040\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/babu-v-state-of-kerala-2010-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-68-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6043\" alt=\"Babu v. State of Kerala\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-68-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-68-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-68-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-68-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-68-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-68.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/babu-v-state-of-kerala-2010-case-summary\/\" title=\"Babu v. State of Kerala 2010 (Case Summary)\">Babu v. State of Kerala 2010 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case emphasizes the critical role that timely reporting and consistent evidence play in criminal trials. The Supreme Court underlined...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/babu-v-state-of-kerala-2010-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6030 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-anticipatory-bail-article-21-section-438-crpc\" data-id=\"6030\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6034\" alt=\"Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/\" title=\"Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra 2011 (Case Summary)\">Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra 2011 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark judgment reaffirmed that anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is a constitutional right emanating from Article 21, and...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6022 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-anticipatory-bail-article-21-section-438-crpc\" data-id=\"6022\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/gurbaksh-singh-sibbia-v-state-of-punjab\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-65-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6023\" alt=\"Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-65-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-65-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-65-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-65-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-65-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-65.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/gurbaksh-singh-sibbia-v-state-of-punjab\/\" title=\"Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab\">Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark case laid down the foundational principles for granting anticipatory bail under Section\u202f438 CrPC. The Supreme Court clarified that...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/gurbaksh-singh-sibbia-v-state-of-punjab\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6014 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-section-438-crpc\" data-id=\"6014\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/sushila-aggarwal-v-state-nct-of-delhi-2020-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-63-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6017\" alt=\"Sushila Aggarwal v. State\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-63-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-63-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-63-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-63-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-63-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-63.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/sushila-aggarwal-v-state-nct-of-delhi-2020-case-summary\/\" title=\"Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2020 (Case Summary)\">Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2020 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This case clarifies that anticipatory bail granted under Section\u202f438 CrPC does not automatically expire when an accused appears before the...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/sushila-aggarwal-v-state-nct-of-delhi-2020-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6007 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-arrest-article-21-section-41-crpc\" data-id=\"6007\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/joginder-kumar-v-state-of-uttar-pradesh-1994-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"406\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-08-13-at-19.53.57_678d922d-1024x406.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6009\" alt=\"Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1994) 4 SCC 260\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-08-13-at-19.53.57_678d922d-1024x406.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-08-13-at-19.53.57_678d922d-300x119.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-08-13-at-19.53.57_678d922d-150x59.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-08-13-at-19.53.57_678d922d-768x304.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/WhatsApp-Image-2025-08-13-at-19.53.57_678d922d.jpg 1275w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/joginder-kumar-v-state-of-uttar-pradesh-1994-case-summary\/\" title=\"Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh 1994 (Case Summary)\">Joginder Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh 1994 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This landmark judgment balanced individual liberty and state authority by clarifying that the power of arrest under Section\u202f41 CrPC must...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/joginder-kumar-v-state-of-uttar-pradesh-1994-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-6000 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-41a-crpc-bail-sections-41crpc\" data-id=\"6000\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/satender-kumar-antil-v-central-bureau-of-investigation-2022-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-text-satender-_JXN3hwOmT2u2GOGqW_b2jg_WCNrs3LeQnGR_nYThL2lNA-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-6001\" alt=\"Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-text-satender-_JXN3hwOmT2u2GOGqW_b2jg_WCNrs3LeQnGR_nYThL2lNA-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-text-satender-_JXN3hwOmT2u2GOGqW_b2jg_WCNrs3LeQnGR_nYThL2lNA-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-text-satender-_JXN3hwOmT2u2GOGqW_b2jg_WCNrs3LeQnGR_nYThL2lNA-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-text-satender-_JXN3hwOmT2u2GOGqW_b2jg_WCNrs3LeQnGR_nYThL2lNA-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/a-legal-document-with-the-text-satender-_JXN3hwOmT2u2GOGqW_b2jg_WCNrs3LeQnGR_nYThL2lNA.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/satender-kumar-antil-v-central-bureau-of-investigation-2022-case-summary\/\" title=\"Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2022 (Case Summary)\">Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation 2022 (Case<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>This judgment brought structural clarity to the bail jurisprudence under the CrPC. The Supreme Court outlined when arrest is necessary,...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/satender-kumar-antil-v-central-bureau-of-investigation-2022-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5352 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-section-190-cr-p-c-section-227-cr-p-c-supreme-court\" data-id=\"5352\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5354\" alt=\"Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan 2013\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/\" title=\"Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan 2013 (Case Summary)\">Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan 2013 (Case Summary)<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case, Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan, concerns the procedural and jurisdictional limits of a Judicial Magistrate in...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5345 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-section-482-crpc-sections-420-ipc\" data-id=\"5345\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/m-s-jk-international-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-others\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-3-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5346\" alt=\"M\/S JK International vs State, Govt of NCT Of Delhi and Others\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-3-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-3-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-3-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-3-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-3-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-3.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/m-s-jk-international-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-others\/\" title=\"M\/S JK International vs State, Govt of NCT Of Delhi and Others 2001 (Case Summary)\">M\/S JK International vs State, Govt of NCT Of Delhi<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case explores the complainant's right to be heard when the accused files a petition for quashing of criminal proceedings...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/m-s-jk-international-vs-state-govt-of-nct-of-delhi-and-others\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5279 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-cognizable-offences-section-494-ipc-section-498a-ipc\" data-id=\"5279\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-orissa-vs-sharat-chandra-sahu-anr-1996-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-2-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5281\" alt=\"State Of Orissa vs Sharat Chandra Sahu &amp; Anr AIR 1997 SC 1\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-2-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-2-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-2-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-2-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-2-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-2.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-orissa-vs-sharat-chandra-sahu-anr-1996-case-summary\/\" title=\"State Of Orissa vs Sharat Chandra Sahu &amp; Anr 1996 (Case Summary)\">State Of Orissa vs Sharat Chandra Sahu &amp; Anr 1996<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The landmark case State of Orissa vs Sharat Chandra Sahu & Anr examines the interplay between procedural requirements when offences...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/state-of-orissa-vs-sharat-chandra-sahu-anr-1996-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5270 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-custodial-torture-custody-jurisprudence\" data-id=\"5270\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/shri-d-k-basu-ashok-k-johri-vs-state-of-west-bengal-state-of-u-p-1997case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-1-1024x576.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5271\" alt=\"Shri D.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri vs State Of West Bengal, State Of U.P AIR 1997 SC 610\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-1-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-1-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-1-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-1-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-1-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Elegant-Cinematic-Wedding-Thumbnail-HD-169-1.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/shri-d-k-basu-ashok-k-johri-vs-state-of-west-bengal-state-of-u-p-1997case-summary\/\" title=\"Shri D.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri vs State of West Bengal, State of U.P. 1996(Case Summary)\">Shri D.K. Basu, Ashok K. Johri vs State of West<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The DK Basu vs State of West Bengal case is a landmark judgment in Indian jurisprudence, addressing the rising concern...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/shri-d-k-basu-ashok-k-johri-vs-state-of-west-bengal-state-of-u-p-1997case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5067 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-section-1563-crpc-supreme-court\" data-id=\"5067\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/madhu-bala-v-suresh-kumar-1997-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-warm-golden-hued-photograph-the-tit_f4hMnnnIRcmuj62GgtEE_Q_kTkwfbYVRf2uYshAPmPoeQ-1024x574.jpeg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5069\" alt=\"Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar 1997\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-warm-golden-hued-photograph-the-tit_f4hMnnnIRcmuj62GgtEE_Q_kTkwfbYVRf2uYshAPmPoeQ-1024x574.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-warm-golden-hued-photograph-the-tit_f4hMnnnIRcmuj62GgtEE_Q_kTkwfbYVRf2uYshAPmPoeQ-300x168.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-warm-golden-hued-photograph-the-tit_f4hMnnnIRcmuj62GgtEE_Q_kTkwfbYVRf2uYshAPmPoeQ-150x84.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-warm-golden-hued-photograph-the-tit_f4hMnnnIRcmuj62GgtEE_Q_kTkwfbYVRf2uYshAPmPoeQ-768x431.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-warm-golden-hued-photograph-the-tit_f4hMnnnIRcmuj62GgtEE_Q_kTkwfbYVRf2uYshAPmPoeQ.jpeg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/madhu-bala-v-suresh-kumar-1997-case-summary\/\" title=\"Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar 1997 (Case Summary)\u200b\">Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar 1997 (Case Summary)\u200b<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The case of Madhu Bala v. State primarily concerns the procedural correctness of the Magistrate's power under Section 156(3) of...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/madhu-bala-v-suresh-kumar-1997-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5058 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-section-498-ipc-supreme-court\" data-id=\"5058\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/arnesh-kumar-v-state-of-bihar-2014-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-detailed-photograph-the-grand-woode_rgb-qJPsTv6-PrUrqLTiaw_9ocg91GeRX2VE3RINz-IPA.jpeg-1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5060\" alt=\"Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar 2014\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-detailed-photograph-the-grand-woode_rgb-qJPsTv6-PrUrqLTiaw_9ocg91GeRX2VE3RINz-IPA.jpeg-1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-detailed-photograph-the-grand-woode_rgb-qJPsTv6-PrUrqLTiaw_9ocg91GeRX2VE3RINz-IPA.jpeg-300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-detailed-photograph-the-grand-woode_rgb-qJPsTv6-PrUrqLTiaw_9ocg91GeRX2VE3RINz-IPA.jpeg-150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-detailed-photograph-the-grand-woode_rgb-qJPsTv6-PrUrqLTiaw_9ocg91GeRX2VE3RINz-IPA.jpeg-768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/in-a-detailed-photograph-the-grand-woode_rgb-qJPsTv6-PrUrqLTiaw_9ocg91GeRX2VE3RINz-IPA.jpeg.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/arnesh-kumar-v-state-of-bihar-2014-case-summary\/\" title=\"Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar 2014 (Case Summary)\u200b\">Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar 2014 (Case Summary)\u200b<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The Arnesh Singh v. State of Bihar (2014) case dealt with the issue of arrest on mere allegations of commission...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/arnesh-kumar-v-state-of-bihar-2014-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><article class=\"eael-grid-post  eael-post-grid-column eael-pg-post-5049 category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita tags-article-32-cognizable-offence-supreme-court\" data-id=\"5049\">\n        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder\">\n            <div class=\"eael-grid-post-holder-inner\"><div class=\"eael-entry-media\"><div class=\"eael-entry-overlay fade-in\"><i class=\"\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-ors-2013-case-summary\/\"rel=\"nofollow\"><\/a><\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-thumbnail eael-image-ratio\">\n                <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"574\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lalita-Kumari-vs-Govt.-of-U.P.-Ors--1024x574.jpg\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-5051\" alt=\"Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P. &amp; Ors\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lalita-Kumari-vs-Govt.-of-U.P.-Ors--1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lalita-Kumari-vs-Govt.-of-U.P.-Ors--300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lalita-Kumari-vs-Govt.-of-U.P.-Ors--150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lalita-Kumari-vs-Govt.-of-U.P.-Ors--768x431.jpg 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Lalita-Kumari-vs-Govt.-of-U.P.-Ors-.jpg 1312w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/>\n            <\/div>\n        <\/div><div class=\"eael-entry-wrapper\"><header class=\"eael-entry-header\"><p class=\"eael-entry-title\"><a class=\"eael-grid-post-link\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-ors-2013-case-summary\/\" title=\"Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P. &#038; Ors 2013 (Case Summary)\u200b\">Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P. &#038; Ors 2013 (Case<\/a><\/p><\/header><div class=\"eael-entry-content\">\n                        <div class=\"eael-grid-post-excerpt\"><p>The Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P. & Ors underscored systemic issues of delayed FIR registration and police inaction in...<\/p><a href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/lalita-kumari-vs-govt-of-u-p-ors-2013-case-summary\/\" class=\"eael-post-elements-readmore-btn\"rel=\"nofollow\">Read More<\/a><\/div>\n                    <\/div><\/div><\/div>\n        <\/div>\n    <\/article><\/div>\n            <div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n        <\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-4d56fd4 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"4d56fd4\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-ede94b4\" data-id=\"ede94b4\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8a4abbe elementor-widget elementor-widget-eael-fancy-text\" data-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"eael-fancy-text.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t<div  class=\"eael-fancy-text-container style-1\" data-fancy-text-id=\"8a4abbe\" data-fancy-text=\"|     to come...\" data-fancy-text-transition-type=\"typing\" data-fancy-text-speed=\"50\" data-fancy-text-delay=\"2500\" data-fancy-text-cursor=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-loop=\"yes\" data-fancy-text-action=\"page_load\" >\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"eael-fancy-text-prefix\">And a lot more <\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<span id=\"eael-fancy-text-8a4abbe\" class=\"eael-fancy-text-strings solid-color\">\n\t\t\t\t<noscript>\n\t\t\t\t\t     to come...\t\t\t\t<\/noscript>\n\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/div><!-- close .eael-fancy-text-container -->\n\n\t<div class=\"clearfix\"><\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) Madhu Bala v. Suresh Kumar 1997 (Case Summary)\u200b The case of Madhu Bala v. State primarily concerns the procedural correctness of the Magistrate&#039;s power under Section 156(3) of&#8230; Read More Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar 2014 (Case Summary)\u200b The Arnesh Singh v. State of Bihar (2014) case dealt with the issue of arrest on mere allegations of commission&#8230; Read More Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P. &#038; Ors 2013 (Case The Lalita Kumari vs Govt. of U.P. &amp; Ors underscored systemic issues of delayed FIR registration and police inaction in&#8230; Read More And a lot more to come&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"no-sidebar","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"full-width-container","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"disabled","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5015","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5015","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5015"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5015\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5082,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5015\/revisions\/5082"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5015"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}