{"id":3269,"date":"2025-01-11T18:18:30","date_gmt":"2025-01-11T18:18:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/?p=3269"},"modified":"2025-03-12T16:04:42","modified_gmt":"2025-03-12T10:34:42","slug":"noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary\/","title":{"rendered":"Noor Saba Khatoon v. Mohd. Quasim  1997(Case Summary)"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"3269\" class=\"elementor elementor-3269\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-917020f elementor-section-full_width elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"917020f\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-5aa9190\" data-id=\"5aa9190\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-inner-section elementor-element elementor-element-0360c7f elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"0360c7f\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-inner-column elementor-element elementor-element-f71d46a\" data-id=\"f71d46a\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d818b36 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"d818b36\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Noor Saba Khatoon v. Mohd. Quasim AIR 1997 SC 3280 (Case Summary)<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-e246dd3 elementor-widget elementor-widget-image\" data-id=\"e246dd3\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"image.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1312\" height=\"736\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim-.jpg\" class=\"attachment-1536x1536 size-1536x1536 wp-image-3271\" alt=\"Noor Saba Khatoon v. Mohd. Quasim AIR 1997 SC 3280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim-.jpg 1312w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim--300x168.jpg 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim--1024x574.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim--150x84.jpg 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim--768x431.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1312px) 100vw, 1312px\" title=\"\">\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0d9ee86 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"0d9ee86\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of a Muslim father\u2019s obligation to provide maintenance for his minor children, even after the mother\u2019s right to maintenance under Muslim personal law ceased post-Iddat. The case clarified the interpretation of Sections 125 and 127 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and their applicability to Muslim fathers in ensuring the welfare of children.<\/span><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 ez-toc-wrap-left counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary\/#Facts_of_Noor_Saba_Khatoon_v_Mohd_Quasim\" >Facts of Noor Saba Khatoon v Mohd. Quasim\u00a0<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary\/#Issues_framed\" >Issues framed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary\/#Subordinate_Court_Judgment\" >Subordinate Court Judgment\u00a0\u00a0<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary\/#Judgment_of_Noor_Saba_Khatoon_v_Mohd_Quasim\" >Judgment of Noor Saba Khatoon v Mohd Quasim<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/family-law\/noor-saba-khatoon-v-mohd-quasim-1997case-summary\/#Read_the_Judgment_below\" >Read the Judgment below.<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Facts_of_Noor_Saba_Khatoon_v_Mohd_Quasim\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Facts of Noor Saba Khatoon v Mohd. Quasim\u00a0<\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><ol><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Noor Saba Khatoon, the appellant, sought maintenance for her minor children from her former husband, Mohd. Quasim, under Section 125 of the CrPC after their divorce.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The husband contended that he was not liable to maintain the children beyond the period prescribed under Muslim personal law.<\/span><\/li><\/ol><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Issues_framed\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Issues framed<\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><ol><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether a Muslim father is obligated to provide maintenance for his minor children beyond the period of Iddat under Muslim personal law?<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether Sections 125 and 127 of the CrPC, which mandate maintenance for dependents, override the provisions of Muslim personal law in ensuring the welfare of children?<\/span><\/li><\/ol><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Subordinate_Court_Judgment\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Subordinate Court Judgment\u00a0\u00a0<\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The trial court awarded maintenance to the children under Section 125 CrPC, holding that the father&#8217;s obligation to maintain his children was not limited by the provisions of Muslim personal law.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mohd. Quasim appealed the trial court\u2019s decision in the High Court, contending that he had no obligation to provide maintenance beyond the Iddat period. However, the High Court upheld the trial court\u2019s decision, ruling that Section 125 CrPC, being a secular law, overrides personal law to ensure the welfare of minor children. The court reaffirmed that the father\u2019s responsibility for child maintenance is not constrained by personal law provisions and continues until the children reach adulthood or can support themselves.<\/span><\/p><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judgment_of_Noor_Saba_Khatoon_v_Mohd_Quasim\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Judgment of Noor Saba Khatoon v Mohd Quasim<\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Court analyzed Sections 125 and 127 of the CrPC and interpreted them in the context of the Muslim personal law, which governs maintenance post-divorce. The court has held that any substantial change in the financial status of either party, such as employment, remarriage, or a drastic change in living expenses, warrants modification of the maintenance order under Section 127 of the CrPC.\u00a0<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Supreme Court held that a Muslim father is obligated to provide maintenance for his minor children under Section 125 CrPC, regardless of the Iddat period stipulated under Muslim personal law. The Court emphasized that the statutory obligation to maintain children under CrPC overrides personal law provisions, as it is aimed at preventing destitution and ensuring welfare.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Supreme Court upheld the rulings of the subordinate courts, concluding that a Muslim father is legally obligated under Section 125 CrPC to provide maintenance to his minor children even after the Iddat period. The Court reiterated that personal law cannot override the statutory provisions designed to protect the interests and welfare of minor children\u200b.\u200b<\/span><\/p><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Read_the_Judgment_below\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>Read the Judgment below.<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8af0c99 elementor-widget elementor-widget-pdfjs-viewer\" data-id=\"8af0c99\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"pdfjs-viewer.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<iframe width=\"\" height=\"700\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/plugins\/pdfjs-viewer-for-elementor\/\/assets\/js\/pdfjs\/web\/viewer.html?file=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Noor-Saba-Khatoon-v.-Mohd.-Quasim-AIR-1997-SC-3280-1.pdf\"><\/iframe>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court of India addressed the issue of a Muslim father\u2019s obligation to provide maintenance for his minor children, even after the mother\u2019s right to maintenance under Muslim personal law ceased post-Iddat. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3271,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4],"tags":[70,82],"class_list":["post-3269","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-family-law","tag-section-125-crpc","tag-section-127-crpc"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3269"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3269\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4296,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3269\/revisions\/4296"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3271"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3269"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}