{"id":5352,"date":"2025-04-06T02:57:50","date_gmt":"2025-04-05T21:27:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/?p=5352"},"modified":"2025-04-20T14:39:24","modified_gmt":"2025-04-20T09:09:24","slug":"ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/","title":{"rendered":"Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan 2013 (Case Summary)"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"5352\" class=\"elementor elementor-5352\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-2bebfc7b elementor-section-full_width elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-equal-height-no\" data-id=\"2bebfc7b\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-455c8cb9\" data-id=\"455c8cb9\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-4e6c9751 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"4e6c9751\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan 2013 (Case Summary)<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-17b40bd elementor-widget elementor-widget-image\" data-id=\"17b40bd\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"image.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1536\" height=\"864\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-1536x864.png\" class=\"attachment-1536x1536 size-1536x1536 wp-image-5354\" alt=\"Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan 2013\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-4.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" title=\"\">\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-726fdbc9 elementor-grid-0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-wpr-sharing-buttons\" data-id=\"726fdbc9\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"wpr-sharing-buttons.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"wpr-sharing-buttons elementor-grid wpr-sharing-official wpr-sharing-label-off wpr-sharing-label-tr\"><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-facebook-f\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fab fa-facebook-f\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/&title=Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan 2013 (Case Summary)&summary=The case, Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan, concerns the procedural and jurisdictional limits of a Judicial Magistrate in cases exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions. The appeal arose from the Magistrate&#039;s discharge of the accused based on a Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement, highlighting the boundaries before the case is committed to a Sessions Court.&source=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-linkedin-in\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fab fa-linkedin-in\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"mailto:?subject=Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan 2013 (Case Summary)&body=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-envelope\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fas fa-envelope\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send?text=*Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan 2013 (Case Summary)*%0ahttps:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-whatsapp\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fab fa-whatsapp\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-497fe004 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"497fe004\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The case, <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">concerns the procedural and jurisdictional limits of a Judicial Magistrate in cases exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions. The appeal arose from the Magistrate&#8217;s discharge of the accused based on a Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement, highlighting the boundaries before the case is committed to a Sessions Court.<\/span><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 ez-toc-wrap-left counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/#Facts_of_Ajay_Kumar_Parmar_vs_State_of_Rajasthan\" >Facts of Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan\u00a0<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/#Issues_framed\" >Issues framed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/#Subordinate_Court_Judgment\" >Subordinate Court Judgment<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/#Judgment_of_Ajay_Kumar_Parmar_vs_State_of_Rajasthan\" >Judgment of Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/ajay-kumar-parmar-vs-state-of-rajasthan\/#Refer_to_the_Judgment_below\" >Refer to the Judgment below.\u00a0<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Facts_of_Ajay_Kumar_Parmar_vs_State_of_Rajasthan\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Facts of Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan\u00a0<\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><ol><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">An FIR was lodged by Pushpa against the appellant, alleging rape and unlawful confinement.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In her statement under section 161 before the Investigating Officer, she claimed that the appellant lured, raped and confined her.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">However, in her Section 164 Cr.P.C. before the Magistrate, she retracted her allegations.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Following the investigation, a charge sheet was filed. However, the Judicial Magistrate, Sheoganj, relied on the Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement and declined cognizance under Sections 376 and 342 IPC. Consequently, the Appellant was Acquitted.<\/span><\/li><\/ol><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Issues_framed\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Issues framed<\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><ol><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether the Judicial Magistrate had jurisdiction to discharge or acquit the accused in a case exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions?<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether the Judicial Magistrate could consider the prosecutrix\u2019s Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement at the stage of taking cognizance?<\/span><\/li><\/ol><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Subordinate_Court_Judgment\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Subordinate Court Judgment <\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Judicial Magistrate, Sheoganj, relying on the Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement, declined cognizance under Sections 376 and 342 IPC, acquitted the appellant, and criticized the investigation.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Sessions Court ruling in favour of the Public Prosecutor held that the Judicial Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to discharge or acquit the Appellant as the offenses under Sections 376 and 342 IPC were exclusively triable by the Sessions Court. The Appellant being aggrieved by the order of the Sessions Court, he appealed to the Hon\u2019ble Rajasthan High Court.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Rajasthan High Court upheld the order of the Sessions Court. The Appellant thereafter, appealed to the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court of India.\u00a0<\/span><\/p><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judgment_of_Ajay_Kumar_Parmar_vs_State_of_Rajasthan\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Judgment of <\/b><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan<\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court analyzed the allegations under Sections 376 and 342 IPC, along with procedural compliance under Sections 161, 164, 190 and 207-209 Cr.P.C. It also examined the discharge plea under Section 227 Cr.P.C. and the admissibility of handwriting analysis under Sections 45, 47, and 73 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court examined the application of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) with respect to the jurisdiction of Magistrates in cases exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions. The Court reaffirmed the principle that upon the filing of a charge sheet in such cases, the Magistrate&#8217;s sole duty is to commit the case to the Court of Sessions under Section 209 Cr.P.C. The Court emphasised that a Magistrate lacks jurisdiction to engage in a merit-based assessment of evidence or consider defence materials at this stage, restricting their role to ascertaining whether the police report discloses a Sessions-triable offence.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Court further analyzed the scope of a Magistrate\u2019s power under Section 190 Cr.P.C. to refuse cognizance. While acknowledging that a Magistrate may decline cognizance if the material on record does not disclose an offence, the Court clarified that this power does not extend to conducting a mini-trial. The Magistrate is not empowered to weigh evidence or assess its reliability at this stage.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court and the order of the Sessions Court. Consequently, the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Sheoganj, acquitting the appellant was set aside.\u00a0<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Supreme Court reiterated that the Judicial Magistrate lacked jurisdiction to discharge the appellant for offences exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions and was mandated to commit the case to that court as per the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The matter was thus directed to proceed before the Court of Sessions in accordance with law.<\/span><\/p><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Refer_to_the_Judgment_below\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Refer to the Judgment below.\u00a0<\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-2b54c2e7 elementor-widget elementor-widget-pdfjs-viewer\" data-id=\"2b54c2e7\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"pdfjs-viewer.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<iframe width=\"\" height=\"700\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/plugins\/pdfjs-viewer-for-elementor\/\/assets\/js\/pdfjs\/web\/viewer.html?file=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Ajay-Kumar-Parmar-vs-State-Of-Rajasthan-1.pdf\"><\/iframe>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The case, Ajay Kumar Parmar vs State of Rajasthan, concerns the procedural and jurisdictional limits of a Judicial Magistrate in cases exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions. The appeal arose from the Magistrate&#8217;s discharge of the accused based on a Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement, highlighting the boundaries before the case is committed to a Sessions Court.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":5354,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[122],"tags":[150,151,12],"class_list":["post-5352","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita","tag-section-190-cr-p-c","tag-section-227-cr-p-c","tag-supreme-court"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5352"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5352\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5681,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5352\/revisions\/5681"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5354"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}