{"id":6030,"date":"2025-08-14T04:40:42","date_gmt":"2025-08-13T23:10:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/?p=6030"},"modified":"2025-08-14T04:46:59","modified_gmt":"2025-08-13T23:16:59","slug":"siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/","title":{"rendered":"Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra 2011 (Case Summary)"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"6030\" class=\"elementor elementor-6030\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-310e736c elementor-section-full_width elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no\" data-id=\"310e736c\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-73c93b2f\" data-id=\"73c93b2f\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-inner-section elementor-element elementor-element-1a3e50a5 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no\" data-id=\"1a3e50a5\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-inner-column elementor-element elementor-element-71f9034c\" data-id=\"71f9034c\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-540bf5c8 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"540bf5c8\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra 2011(Case Summary)<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-e9c25e7 elementor-widget elementor-widget-image\" data-id=\"e9c25e7\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"image.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1536\" height=\"864\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-1536x864.png\" class=\"attachment-1536x1536 size-1536x1536 wp-image-6034\" alt=\"Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-66.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" title=\"\">\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-799aa4cc elementor-grid-0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-wpr-sharing-buttons\" data-id=\"799aa4cc\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"wpr-sharing-buttons.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"wpr-sharing-buttons elementor-grid wpr-sharing-official wpr-sharing-label-off wpr-sharing-label-tr\"><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-facebook-f\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fab fa-facebook-f\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/&title=Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra 2011 (Case Summary)&summary=This landmark judgment reaffirmed that anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is a constitutional right emanating from Article 21, and not merely an exceptional remedy. The Supreme Court clarified that&source=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-linkedin-in\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fab fa-linkedin-in\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"mailto:?subject=Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra 2011 (Case Summary)&body=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-envelope\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fas fa-envelope\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send?text=*Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra 2011 (Case Summary)*%0ahttps:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-whatsapp\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fab fa-whatsapp\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-4aacad2d elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"4aacad2d\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This landmark judgment reaffirmed that anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is a constitutional right emanating from Article 21, and not merely an exceptional remedy. The Supreme Court clarified that, in the absence of specific restriction, anticipatory bail continues through the trial unless revoked.<\/span><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_83 ez-toc-wrap-left counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/#Facts_of_Siddharam_Satlingappa_Mhetre_v_State_of_Maharashtra\" >Facts of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/#Issues_framed\" >Issues framed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/#Subordinate_Court_Judgment\" >Subordinate Court Judgment<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/#Judgment_of_Siddharam_Satlingappa_Mhetre_v_State_of_Maharashtra\" >Judgment of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/siddharam-satlingappa-mhetre-v-state-of-maharashtra-2011-case-summary\/#Read_the_Judgment_below\" >Read the Judgment below.<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Facts of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra<\/b><\/span><\/h2><ol><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre, a political figure, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC due to fear of arrest in cases including murder and rioting.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Bombay High Court denied anticipatory bail, citing the seriousness of charges.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mhetre challenged the order in the Supreme Court, arguing that bail should not automatically terminate upon filing of charge sheet or arrest.<\/span><\/li><\/ol><h2><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Issues framed<\/b><\/span><\/h2><ol><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is an extraordinary remedy or part of Article 21?<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether anticipatory bail terminates on filing of a chargesheet or upon arrest unless specifically limited?<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether the denial of anticipatory bail solely based on serious allegations is permissible?<\/span><\/li><\/ol><h2><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Subordinate Court Judgment<\/b><\/span><\/h2><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Bombay High Court refused anticipatory bail based on the gravity of allegations and public perception.<\/span><\/p><h2><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Judgment of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra<\/b><\/span><\/h2><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Supreme Court held that anticipatory bail is to be interpreted in light of Article 21, and is not limited only to exceptional cases. The Court pointed out that Section 438 Cr.P.C. does not mention anything about the duration to which a direction for release on bail can be granted Once such a direction of anticipatory bail is executed the concerned court would be fully justified in imposing conditions including direction of joining investigation.\u00a0<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Court said that restrictions such as conditional surrender or automatic expiry are inconsistent with the legislative intent and constitutional guarantee and stated that the order granting anticipatory bail for a limited duration and thereafter directing the accused to surrender is contrary to the basic intention and spirit of Section 438 Cr.P.C. It is also contrary to Article 21 of the Constitution.<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While affirming the broad scope of Section\u202f438, the Court outlined relevant factors courts should consider before granting anticipatory bail:<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u201cThe following factors and parameters can be taken into consideration while dealing with the anticipatory bail:<\/span><\/p><ol><li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The nature and gravity of the accusation and the exact role of the accused must be properly comprehended before arrest is made;<\/span><\/li><li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The antecedents of the applicant including the fact as to whether the accused has previously undergone imprisonment on conviction by a Court in respect of any cognizable offence;<\/span><\/li><\/ol><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">iii. The possibility of the applicant to flee from justice;<\/span><\/p><ol><li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The possibility of the accused&#8217;s likelihood to repeat similar or the other offences.<\/span><\/li><li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Where the accusations have been made only with the object of injuring or humiliating the applicant by arresting him or her.<\/span><\/li><li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Impact of grant of anticipatory bail particularly in cases of large magnitude affecting a very large number of people.<\/span><\/li><\/ol><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">vii. The courts must evaluate the entire available material against the accused very carefully. The court must also clearly comprehend the exact role of the accused in the case. The cases in which accused is implicated with the help of Sections 34 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code, the court should consider with even greater care and caution because over implication in the cases is a matter of common knowledge and concern;<\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">viii. While considering the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, a balance has to be struck between two factors namely, no prejudice should be caused to the free, fair and full investigation and there should be prevention of harassment, humiliation and unjustified detention of the accused;<\/span><\/p><ol><li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> The court to consider reasonable apprehension of tampering of the witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant;<\/span><\/li><li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> Frivolity in prosecution should always be considered and it is only the element of genuineness that shall have to be considered in the matter of grant of bail and in the event of there being some doubt as to the genuineness of the prosecution, in the normal course of events, the accused is entitled to an order of bail.\u201d<\/span><\/li><\/ol><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In conclusion, the Supreme Court allowed Mhetre\u2019s appeal, directing that his anticipatory bail be maintained throughout the trial. The judgment underscores that limitations on anticipatory bail must be based on reasoned judicial conditions, not automatic or rigid rules\u2014and reaffirms that personal liberty cannot be curtailed by mechanical application of conditions.<\/span><\/p><h2><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Read the Judgment below.<\/b><\/span><\/h2>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-3f055b2a elementor-widget elementor-widget-pdfjs-viewer\" data-id=\"3f055b2a\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"pdfjs-viewer.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<iframe width=\"\" height=\"700\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/plugins\/pdfjs-viewer-for-elementor\/\/assets\/js\/pdfjs\/web\/viewer.html?file=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/37199-1.pdf\"><\/iframe>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-3c33c8c3 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no wpr-column-slider-no wpr-equal-height-no\" data-id=\"3c33c8c3\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-37a06ac\" data-id=\"37a06ac\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This landmark judgment reaffirmed that anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is a constitutional right emanating from Article 21, and not merely an exceptional remedy. The Supreme Court clarified that<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":6034,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[122],"tags":[193,13,192],"class_list":["post-6030","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita","tag-anticipatory-bail","tag-article-21","tag-section-438-crpc"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6030"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6030\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6039,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6030\/revisions\/6039"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6034"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6030"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}