{"id":6094,"date":"2025-08-15T02:22:45","date_gmt":"2025-08-14T20:52:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/?p=6094"},"modified":"2025-08-15T02:28:59","modified_gmt":"2025-08-14T20:58:59","slug":"this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/","title":{"rendered":"Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali 2013 (Case Summary)"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"6094\" class=\"elementor elementor-6094\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-1fa2c94f elementor-section-full_width elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"1fa2c94f\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-201af1e4\" data-id=\"201af1e4\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-inner-section elementor-element elementor-element-16081942 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"16081942\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-inner-column elementor-element elementor-element-15e4c891\" data-id=\"15e4c891\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-7aa132a6 elementor-widget elementor-widget-heading\" data-id=\"7aa132a6\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"heading.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h1 class=\"elementor-heading-title elementor-size-default\">Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali 2013\n(Case Summary)<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-6c9bd208 elementor-widget elementor-widget-image\" data-id=\"6c9bd208\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"image.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1536\" height=\"864\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-1536x864.png\" class=\"attachment-1536x1536 size-1536x1536 wp-image-6096\" alt=\"Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali\" srcset=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-150x84.png 150w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fawyerz-76.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" title=\"\">\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-276dc2ff elementor-grid-0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-wpr-sharing-buttons\" data-id=\"276dc2ff\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"wpr-sharing-buttons.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"wpr-sharing-buttons elementor-grid wpr-sharing-official wpr-sharing-label-off wpr-sharing-label-tr\"><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-facebook-f\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fab fa-facebook-f\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/shareArticle?mini=true&url=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/&title=Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali 2013 (Case Summary)&summary=This case explained what courts can do when they receive a supplementary or further investigation report that is different from the original charge sheet. The Supreme Court held that the Magistrate is &source=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-linkedin-in\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fab fa-linkedin-in\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"mailto:?subject=Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali 2013 (Case Summary)&body=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-envelope\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fas fa-envelope\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><div class=\"elementor-grid-item\"><a href=\"https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send?text=*Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali 2013 (Case Summary)*%0ahttps:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/\" class=\"wpr-sharing-icon wpr-sharing-whatsapp\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\"><i class=\"fab fa-whatsapp\"><\/i><\/a><\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-52bbaac elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"52bbaac\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This case explained what courts can do when they receive a supplementary or further investigation report that is different from the original charge sheet. The Supreme Court held that the Magistrate is not bound to accept only the first report but can consider all reports and evidence together to decide whether to proceed with the case.<\/span><\/p><div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_82_2 ez-toc-wrap-left counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-custom ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #000000;color:#000000\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/#Facts_of_Vinay_Tyagi_v_Irshad_Ali\" >Facts of Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/#Issues_framed\" >Issues framed<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/#Subordinate_Court_Judgment\" >Subordinate Court Judgment<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/#Judgment_of_Vinay_Tyagi_v_Irshad_Ali\" >Judgment of Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita\/this-case-explained-what-courts-can-do-when-they-receive-a-supplementary-or-further-investigation-report-that-is-different-from-the-original-charge-sheet-the-supreme-court-held-that-the-magistrate-is\/#Refer_to_the_Judgment_below\" >Refer to the Judgment below.<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Facts_of_Vinay_Tyagi_v_Irshad_Ali\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Facts of Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali <br \/><\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><ol><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Irshad Ali and another person were arrested on terrorism-related charges, and an initial charge sheet was filed by the Delhi Police against them.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Later, the CBI conducted a further investigation under Section 173(8) of the CrPC and filed a supplementary report, concluding that the case was fabricated and recommending closure.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The trial court chose to rely solely on the original report and refused to accept the findings of the CBI&#8217;s supplementary report.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The question arose whether the Magistrate had the authority to independently assess and choose between conflicting reports.<\/span><\/li><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The case was taken to the Supreme Court to determine the scope of a Magistrate\u2019s powers when dealing with multiple investigation reports<\/span><\/li><\/ol><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Issues_framed\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Issues framed<\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><ol><li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether a Magistrate is bound to accept the first charge sheet filed under Section 173(2) CrPC?<\/span><\/li><li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Whether the Magistrate can consider a supplementary report filed under Section 173(8) CrPC that contradicts the original report?<\/span><\/li><li>Whether the Magistrate has the power to apply judicial mind and take a view based on the totality of the material before him?<\/li><\/ol><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Subordinate_Court_Judgment\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><b>Subordinate Court Judgment <\/b><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The trial court refused to act on the supplementary report that gave a clean chit to the accused. The High Court upheld this view, and the matter came to the Supreme Court.<\/span><\/p><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Judgment_of_Vinay_Tyagi_v_Irshad_Ali\"><\/span><b style=\"color: #993300; font-size: 1.22222rem; font-style: inherit;\">Judgment of Vinay Tyagi v. Irshad Ali<\/b><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Court examined Sections 173(2), 173(8), and 190 CrPC (now Sections 193(2), 193(8), and 210 BNSS). It clarified that there is no legal bar stopping a Magistrate from considering a supplementary report, even if it differs from the original one. The Magistrate must act judicially and examine all the evidence on record before taking a decision. The idea is not to blindly accept the police\u2019s view but to independently evaluate the case.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/><\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Court made it clear that the supplementary report under Section 173(8) is not subordinate to the main report under 173(2). Both are part of the same investigation process. The Magistrate has the power to either accept the initial report, accept the supplementary one, or reject both if there are valid reasons. What matters is whether there is enough material to proceed against the accused.<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/><\/span><\/p><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In the final ruling, the Court held that the Magistrate had made a mistake by ignoring the CBI\u2019s report and that he should have considered it on merit. The case reaffirmed the role of judicial application of mind and confirmed that courts are not passive players in the investigation process. It strengthened the principle that justice must not be sacrificed in procedural confusion.<\/span><\/p><h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Refer_to_the_Judgment_below\"><\/span><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">R<\/span><span style=\"color: #993300; font-size: 1.22222rem; font-style: inherit;\">efer to the Judgment below.<\/span><\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-1d193c07 elementor-widget elementor-widget-pdfjs-viewer\" data-id=\"1d193c07\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-e-type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"pdfjs-viewer.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<iframe width=\"\" height=\"700\" src=\"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/plugins\/pdfjs-viewer-for-elementor\/\/assets\/js\/pdfjs\/web\/viewer.html?file=https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/39831-1.pdf\"><\/iframe>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-5432becc elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default wpr-particle-no wpr-jarallax-no wpr-parallax-no wpr-sticky-section-no\" data-id=\"5432becc\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-e-type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-51fa4ab9\" data-id=\"51fa4ab9\" data-element_type=\"column\" data-e-type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This case explained what courts can do when they receive a supplementary or further investigation report that is different from the original charge sheet. The Supreme Court held that the Magistrate is <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":6096,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[122],"tags":[206,203,205,204],"class_list":["post-6094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita","tag-210-bnss","tag-charge-sheet","tag-section-1732-crpc","tag-section-1738-crpc"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6094"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6094\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6101,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6094\/revisions\/6101"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6096"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/fawyerz.in\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}